克氏针锚定内镜腰椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病  

Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion following guide of anchored Kirschner wire for lumbar degenerative diseases

作　　者：程冠宇 刘欢[1] 孙鹏[1] 葛运如[1] 费昊东[1] 黄河 王守国[1] CHENG Guan-yu;LIU Huan;SUN Peng;GE Yun-ru;FEI Hao-dong;HUANG He;WANG Shou-guo(Department of Orthopedics,First People's Hos-pital of Huaian City,Nanjing Medical University,Huai'an 223300,China)

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院骨科,江苏淮安223300

出　　处：《中国矫形外科杂志》2024年第9期794-800,共7页Orthopedic Journal of China

摘　　要：[目的]探讨克氏针锚定定位在内镜腰椎间融合术(endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion,Endo-LIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾(lumbar degenerative disease,LDD)中的意义。[方法]回顾性分析2021年1月—2023年1月于本院行Endo-LIF治疗LDD 108例患者的临床资料。依据术前医患沟通结果,53例患者接受传统可视化环锯辅助下的Endo-LIF治疗(传统组),55例患者接受克氏针锚定技术结合可视化环锯辅助下的Endo-LIF治疗(克氏针组)。比较两组围手术期、随访和影像学资料。[结果]两组患者均顺利完成手术,无严重并发症。克氏针组手术时间[(108.1±5.5)min vs(122.4±6.5)min,P<0.001]、术中失血量[(56.3±6.7)ml vs(71.5±10.2)ml,P<0.001]、术中透视时长[(13.1±1.3)s vs(17.2±0.9)s,P<0.001]均显著优于传统组,而两组在下地行走时间和住院时间方面的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者随访(20.8±4.0)个月,两组恢复完全负重活动时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随时间推移,两组患者腰痛VAS、腿痛VAS、ODI评分均显著减少(P<0.05),而JOA评分显著增加(P<0.05)。相应时间点,两组患者的腰痛VAS、腿痛VAS、ODI评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,与术前相比,末次随访时两组患者的腰椎前凸角均无显著变化(P>0.05)。末次随访时,两组椎间融合Bridwell评级的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]采用克氏针锚定定位Endo-LIF治疗LDD可取得良好的效果,既可提高术中骨开窗效率,减少术中出血,又可降低医患辐射。[Objective]To explore the significance of anchored Kirschner wire used as a guide in endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion(Endo-LIF)for lumbar degenerative diseases(LDD).[Methods]A retrospective study was done on 108 patients who received Endo-LIF for LDD in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2023.According to preoperative doctor-patient discussion,53 patients had Endo-LIF per⁃formed in conventional manner with the visualizing trephine(the traditional group),while other 55 patients received Endo-LIF with the visu⁃alizing trephine following the guide by anchored Kirschner wire(the K-wire group).The perioperative,follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]All patients in both groups successfully completed operation without serious complications.The K-wrie group proved significantly superior to the traditional group in terms of operative time[(108.1±5.5)min vs(122.4±6.5)min,P<0.001],intraop⁃erative blood loss[(56.3±6.7)ml vs(71.5±10.2)ml,P<0.001],intraoperative fluoroscopy duration[(13.1±1.3)s vs(17.2±0.9)s,P<0.001],de⁃spite of the fact that no significant differences were noted in postoperative walking time and hospital stay between them(P>0.05).All patients in the two groups were followed up for(20.8±4.0)months,and there was no significant difference in time to regain full weight-bearing activi⁃ties between the two groups(P>0.05).As time went on,lower back pain VAS,leg pain VAS and ODI scores significantly decreased(P<0.05),while JOA scores significantly increased in both groups(P<0.05),whereas which were not significantly different between the two cohorts at any time points accordingly.With respect of imaging,there were no significant changes in lumbar lordosis angle in both groups at the last fol⁃low-up compared with that preoperatively(P>0.05).At the last follow-up,there was no a significant difference in the Bridwell grade of inter⁃body fusion between the two groups(P>0.05).[Conclusion]Endo-LIF following guide of anchored Kirschner wiredoes achieve good results

关 键 词：腰椎退变性疾病 内镜腰椎间融合 克氏针锚定定位 临床结果 

分 类 号：R681.57[医药卫生—骨科学]