检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张敏 Zhang Min(Department of Gynecology,Donghai County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Lianyungang 222300,China)
出 处:《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2024年第6期120-122,共3页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
摘 要:目的观察团组护理干预对宫颈癌患者同步放化疗后生活质量、满意度、心理状态的影响。方法选取68例宫颈癌患者为研究对象,使用随机分配法将其分为甲组和乙组,每组34例。两组均接受同步放化疗,在此期间,甲组采用常规护理,乙组在此基础上采用团组护理干预。对比两组患者的生活质量、满意度及心理状态。结果护理后,乙组各项生活质量评分均比甲组高(P<0.05)。乙组满意度为97.06%,高于甲组的79.41%(P<0.05)。护理后,乙组各项负性情绪评分均比甲组低(P<0.05)。结论宫颈癌患者在同步放化疗期间接受团组护理干预具有明显优势,不仅能有效提升其生活质量及满意度,还能在一定程度上改善其心理状态,值得推广。Objective To observe the effect of group nursing intervention on quality of life,satisfaction and psychological state of cervical cancer patients after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods 68 patients with cervical cancer were selected as the study objects and were randomly assigned to group A and group B,with 34 cases in each group.Both groups received concurrent chemoradiotherapy.During this period,group A received routine nursing and group B received group nursing intervention on this basis.The quality of life,satisfaction and psychological state of the two groups were compared.Results After nursing,the scores of quality of life in group B were higher than those in group A(P<0.05).The satisfaction of group B was 97.06%,which was higher than 79.41% of group A(P<0.05).After nursing,all negative emotion scores in group B were lower than those in group A(P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with cervical cancer receiving group nursing intervention during concurrent chemoradiotherapy has obvious advantages,which can not only effectively improve their quality of life and satisfaction,but also improve their psychological state to a certain extent,which is worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28