检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡志高 胡平放[2] 王彦芳 康杰 朱娜[2] 雷飞[2] HU Zhigao;HU Pingfang;WANG Yanfang;KANG Jie;ZHU Na;LEI Fei
机构地区:[1]湖北风神净化空调设备工程有限公司,湖北武汉430060 [2]华中科技大学环境科学与工程学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《煤气与热力》2024年第3期I0001-I0005,共5页Gas & Heat
摘 要:对武汉部分公共建筑地埋管地源热泵系统运行参数进行测试,对系统能效水平进行评价。将传统供能系统(常规水冷冷水机组+天然气锅炉)作为比较对象,计算地埋管地源热泵系统节能率。部分项目的热泵系统制冷、制热性能未能达标,但差距不大。热泵机组供回水温差普遍偏小。项目水泵能耗水平优于全国实测水平,但少数项目水泵能耗偏高。各项目的节能率为17.0%~50.9%,平均节能率为31.0%,节能性比较好。The operating parameters of the buried pipe ground-source heat pump system in some public buildings in Wuhan were tested,and the energy efficiency level of the system was evaluated.The traditional energy supply system(conventional water-cooled chiller+natural gas boiler)was used as the comparison object to calculate the energy saving rate of the buried pipe ground-source heat pump system.The refrigeration and heating performance of some heat pump systems in certain projects did not meet the standards,but the difference was not significant.The difference in water temperature between the supply and return of heat pump units is generally small.The energy consumption level of water pumps in the project is higher than the national measured level,but a few projects have higher energy consumption of water pumps.The energy-saving rate of each project is 17.0%-50.9%,with an average energy-saving rate of 31.0%,indicating good energy-saving performance.
分 类 号:TU995.7[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171