名实难副——从《庄子》“内七篇”看庄子的语言游戏及解构策略  

Inconsistency Between“Name”and“Reality”--Zhuangzi’s Freeplay of Language and Strategies of Deconstruction in the“Inner Seven Chapters”of Zhuangzi

作　　者：金洁[1] 王玉明[1] JIN Jie;WANG Yuming(School of Foreign Languages,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,Anhui)

机构地区：[1]安徽农业大学外国语学院,安徽合肥230036

出　　处：《阜阳师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期23-28,共6页Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science

基　　金：2022年安徽省省级质量工程教学研究项目“‘理解当代中国’视阈下跨文化课程育人机制研究”(2022jyxm436)。

摘　　要：解构作为一种古老的智慧并非德里达专有。天然解构大师庄子在《庄子》“内七篇”里以自由游戏的姿态切断了语言确定性的根基,并假借一群“名不副实”之人在“名”与“实”间进行自由游戏,从而揭露了“名”与“实”、能指与所指之间的矛盾和不一致。这一东方解构范例在传统庄子诠释学之外为我们提供了一个活泼且具有现代意义的庄子形象。同时,庄子对名言枷锁的解构,也使得儒道精神大放异彩,揭开了中国古代文化哲学儒道兼宗的序幕。Deconstruction,an ancient wisdom,is not exclusive to Derrida.Zhuangzi,a master of natural deconstruction,undermines the foundation of linguistic certainty in the"Inner Seven Chapters"of Zhuangzi,and plays a free game between"name"and"reality"under the guise of a group of people with"false names",thus exposing the contradictions and inconsistencies between"name"and"reality",the signifier and the signified.This Oriental example of deconstruction provides us with a lively and modern image of Zhuangzi apart from the traditional hermeneutics.At the same time,Zhuangzi's deconstruction of the shackles of language also makes the spirit of Confucianism and Taoism outshine each other,and ushers in the prelude to the combination of Confucianism and Taoism in ancient Chinese cultural philosophy.

关 键 词：庄子 “内七篇” 解构 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]