第三方不同方式介入流转对转入方林地投入的影响——兼顾产权特征与规模特征的考察  

The impact of different third-party intervention methods on the forestland input by the transferee——examination that balances property rights and scale characteristics

作　　者：陈甲 王建华 吉星 张红霄[4] CHEN Jia;WANG Jianhua;JI Xing;ZHANG Hongxiao(Wuxi Municipal Party School of the Communist Party of China,Wuxi 214128;Wuxi Branch,Jiangsu Academy of Social Sciences,Wuxi 214128;School of Business,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122;College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037)

机构地区：[1]无锡市委党校,无锡214128 [2]江苏省社会科学院无锡分院,无锡214128 [3]江南大学商学院,无锡214122 [4]南京林业大学经济管理学院,南京210037

出　　处：《林业经济》2024年第3期5-27,共23页Forestry Economics

基　　金：国家自然科学青年基金项目“集体林区采伐管制变迁、农户生计转型与森林资源质量”(7200030610);国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目“中国集体林区林业社会化服务的农民福利效应研究”(202208320345);江苏省党校系统调研课题“农地流转租金分化对转入方生产长期投入行为的影响研究——基于苏南地区的经验考察”(XT23026);无锡市哲学社会科学招标课题“无偿流转对经营者保护性耕作行为的影响研究”(WXSK23-C-11);无锡市委党校专项课题“乡村振兴背景下工商资本下乡的共同富裕效应研究”(XL2309);2023年无锡市党校系统科研课题“无偿流转对农业绿色生产的影响研究”(XT2306)。

摘　　要：集体林权制度改革的重要政策目标是促进林地流转,以及提高转入方的林地投入水平。实践中基层政府或村委会常作为第三方介入林地流转。文章利用2022年在湖南、贵州、云南三省调研获得的457个林地转入地块样本,采用似不相关回归模型实证检验第三方介入以及第三方不同方式介入流转对转入方林地投入的影响。研究结果显示:(1)第三方介入流转提高了转入方对林地的投入水平,相比于自发流转,第三方中介组织影响转入方资本投入的边际效应为30.71%,第三方行政主导影响转入方资本投入的边际效应为22.31%,第三方中介组织对转入方的林地投入激励作用更明显。(2)从产权实施的角度,相比于第三方行政主导,第三方中介组织降低了林地流转事后发生纠纷概率,边际效应为13.41%,第三方中介组织能更好地强化林地经营权稳定性。(3)从规模匹配的角度,相比于第三方行政主导,第三方中介组织在1%的显著性水平上降低了转入方实际需求与转入面积不匹配的概率,边际效应为17.42%。文章在考虑第三方角色差异的基础上,关注了不同介入方式中产权特征和规模特征的差别。研究结论表明,第三方对林地流转进行适当的干预存在合理性和必要性,但需要平衡政府职能与市场作用的边界,将第三方介入的手段限定在信息传递、协调服务和合约保障等方面。The important policy objective of collective forest tenure system reform is to promote the transfer of forestland and the level of forestland input by the transferee.In practice,the grass-roots governments or village committees often act as the third to intervene in forestland transfer.Based on the sample of 457 forestland transfer plots obtained from the survey in Hunan,Guizhou and Yunnan provinces in 2022,this paper employed the Seemingly Unrelated Regression(SUR)model to empirically test the impact of the third-party intervention and different ways of the third-party intervention on the input of transferred forestland.The results showed that:(1)The third-party intervention in transfer increased the input level of the transferee in forestland.Compared with the spontaneous transfer,the marginal effect of the third-party intermediary organizations on the transferee's capital input was 30.71%,and the marginal effect of the third-party administrative leadership on the transferee's capital input was 22.31%.The incentive effect of the third-party intermediary organizations on the transferee's forestland investment was more significant.(2)From the perspective of property tenure implementation,compared with the third-party administrative leadership,the third-party intermediary organizations reduced the probability of disputes after the forestland transfer,with a marginal effect of 13.41%.The third-party intermediary organizations could better strengthen the stability of forestland management rights.(3)From the perspective of scale matching,compared with the third-party administrative leadership,the third-party intermediary organizations reduced the probability of mismatch between the transferee's actual demand and the transferred area at a significance level of 1%,with a marginal effect of 17.42%.On the basis of considering the differences in the third-party roles,this paper focused on the differences of property rights and scale characteristics in different intervention methods.The research conclusion indicated that i

关 键 词：林地流转 林地投入 第三方介入 介入方式 产权特征 规模特征 

分 类 号：F326.67[经济管理—产业经济]