论自媒体表达自由与名誉权保护的自净规则及私法规制  

On the Self-Purification Rule and Private Law Regulation on Freedom of Expression and Protection of Reputation Rights in We-Media

作　　者：徐琎 XU Jin(School of Marxism,Huaibei Institute of Technology,Huaibei Anhui 235000,China)

机构地区：[1]淮北理工学院马克思主义学院,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《铜陵学院学报》2024年第2期71-74,共4页Journal of Tongling University

基　　金：安徽省科学研究重点项目“自媒体行为与责任的规范研究——基于《民法典》视角”(2022AH052245)。

摘　　要：自媒体名誉侵权行为日益增多,平衡与保护自媒体表达自由与名誉权成为规制网络侵权的核心问题之一。面对自媒体表达自由与名誉权保护之间的冲突,在发挥以自媒体平台自律规范为代表的自净规则重要作用的同时,应基于《民法典》相关条款构建私法规制体系,以弥补自净规则缺乏强制力和权威性的不足。只有确保自净规则与私法规制有机协同,使二者在适用过程中形成互补,自媒体世界才能实现清朗有序。The increasing number of We-media reputation infringement behaviors has made balancing the protection of We-media freedom of expression and reputation rights one of the core issues in regulating online infringement.In the face of the conflict between freedom of expression in We-media and protection of reputation rights,while leveraging the important role of self-purification rules represented by We-media platform self-discipline norms,a private law regulatory system should be constructed based on relevant provisions of the Civil Code to compensate for the lack of compulsion and authority of self purification rules.Only by ensuring the organic synergy between self-purification rules and private law regulations,and forming complementarity between the two in the application process,can the world of We-media achieve a clear and orderly environment.

关 键 词：表达自由 自净规则 私法规制 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]