传世文献中“王城”与“成周”之方位沿革  

The Location Evolution of“Wangcheng”and“Chengzhou”in Historical Documents

作　　者：孟奂 MENG Huan(School of History and Culture,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610225,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610225

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期99-104,共6页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(21CZS058)。

摘　　要：不同时代的传世文献对周代“王城”与“成周”方位及其沿革具有的不同观点,可概括为东周双城说、西周双城说、西周—春秋单城说和合城说。其中今文经学的东周双城说是基于战国洛阳地区政治形势的叙述,继之演化而来的古文经学的西周双城说为王朝政治的合法性提供支持,因而具有广泛稳定的影响力。相较之下,西周—春秋单城说较为有据,而仅作为某种史学观点存在。合城说则是调和经史与文献记载矛盾的观点。囿于史料的缺乏与彼此矛盾,各观点尽管不能完全解决有关周代“王城”与“成周”的确切方位问题,但是其源流发展揭示了经学与史学各自相异的治学旨趣和学术地位。The handed down literature of different eras has different views on the location and evolution of the“Wang Cheng”and“Cheng Zhou”in the Zhou Dynasty,which can be summarized as the Double City Viewpoint in the Eastern or the Western Zhou,the Western Zhou and the Spring and Autumn Period Single City Viewpoint,and the Overlapped City Viewpoint.the Double City Viewpoint in the Eastern Zhou is based on the political situation in Luoyang during the Warring States period,and the Double City Viewpoint in the Western Zhou provides support for the legitimacy of dynasty politics and thus has a wide and stable influence.In contrast,the Western Zhou and the Spring and Autumn Period Single City Viewpoint is valid and only exists as a certain historical viewpoint.the Overlapped City Viewpoint is a viewpoint that reconciles the contradictions between classics and historical records.Although various viewpoints cannot fully solve the exact location of“Wang Cheng”and“Cheng Zhou”,their origins and development reveal the different academic interests and positions of Confucianism and historiography.

关 键 词：城市史 洛阳 周王城 成周 地理思想 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]