《经传释词》“为”字条辨析  

The Discrimination of the Explanation of Wei(“为”)in Jing Zhuan Shi Ci

作　　者：孙洪伟[1] SUN Hong-wei(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系,广州510275

出　　处：《嘉应学院学报》2024年第2期72-76,共5页Journal of Jiaying University

基　　金：高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“基于上古汉语语义知识库的历史语法与词汇研究”(18JJD74002)。

摘　　要：《经传释词》在虚词研究上的贡献和不足,前人多有论述,但对其中的义项和例句,则缺乏全面详细的辨析。本文选取其中义项较多的“为”字条,对其义项和例句逐一进行检视,观察其例句的分析是否正确,义项的设立是否合理。文章认为“犹用也”“犹使也”“犹则也”“犹与也”“犹有也”五个义项是不能成立的;“犹于也”“犹谓也”“语助也”虽可成立,其中部分例句分析有误。文章还从历时的角度,分析了“犹将也”“犹如也”“语助也”三个义项的来源。Although the merits and limitations of Jing Zhuan Shi Ci(经传释词)in the study of functional words have been widelydiscussed by previous researchers,yet there remains a lack of comprehensive and detailed analysis of its senses and examplesentences.This paper scrutinizes Wei(为),an lexeme encapsulating numerous senses,to validate the appropriateness of sentenceanalyses and the rationale behind the interpretation of senses.It is argued that the interpretation of the five senses,namely Yong(犹用也),Shi(犹使也),Ze(犹则也),Yu(犹与也)and You(犹有也)lacks reasonability.While the establishment of senses of Yu(犹于也),Wei(犹谓也),and Yuzhu(语助也)is plausible,errors permeate their respective example sentence analyses.The paper alsodelves into the origins of three senses Jiang(犹将也),Ru(犹如也)and Yuzhu(语助也)from a diachronic perspective.

关 键 词：《经传释词》 “为” 义项 准系词 语法化 

分 类 号：H109.2[语言文字—汉语]