国际数据管理计划工具比较研究  

A Comparative Study of International Data Management Plan Tools

作　　者：殷沈琴[1,2] 徐萍 Yin Shenqin;Xu Ping(Humanities and Social Science Data Research Institute of Fudan University;Shanghai Big Data Joint Innovation Lab-Science&Research Unit;Literature and Information Center of Fudan University)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学人文社科数据研究所,上海200433 [2]上海市科研领域大数据联合创新实验室 [3]复旦大学文献信息中心,上海200433

出　　处：《图书馆杂志》2024年第4期108-117,142,共11页Library Journal

摘　　要：采纳一定的标准,特别是以主流、用户量大的数据管理计划(DMP)工具作为代表,遴选出6种研究数据管理计划工具作为研究对象,结合实际试用、前人研究和专家访谈,从科研人员使用和体验视角采用综合性研究方法,厘清工具比较评估的核心要素,构建工具比较评估的三级指标体系,就基本功能、DMP模板内容、用户体验开展比较分析,研究结果呈现通用DMP工具的典型特性和未来发展趋势,供我国出台相关政策和研发工具借鉴参考。This study conducts a comparative analysis focusing on six selected research data management plan(DMP)tools,chosen based on specific criteria and especially by selecting mainstream and widely used DMP tools as representatives.By integrating practical trials,prior research,and expert interviews,this research takes a comprehensive approach from the perspective of researchers’usage and experiences.Core elements for assessing and comparing these tools have been elucidated,and a threetier system for evaluation has been established.The comparative analysis encompasses an examination of fundamental features,DMP templates and an evaluation of user experiences.The study findings delineate typical characteristics and future developmental trends of universally applicable DMP tools,thereby offering insights for the formulation of pertinent policies and the development of tools in China.

关 键 词：数据管理计划 DMP 数据管理计划工具 DMP工具 FAIR原则 

分 类 号：G203[文化科学—传播学]