检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张虹[1] 王军明[1] Zhang Hong;Wang Junming(Department of Ophthalmology,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院眼科,武汉430030
出 处:《中华眼科杂志》2024年第5期399-402,共4页Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(82271090、81974133、82271089)。
摘 要:微创青光眼手术(MIGS)的应用给青光眼的治疗提供了更多的选择。其中,针对小梁网-Schlemm管房水外流阻力位点设计的MIGS近年应用广泛,这也使房水流出通路的生理功能及病理改变逐渐成为研究热点。然而,近全周或全周切开小梁网组织后,能否如预期达到降低房水流出阻力的目的,以及开角型青光眼患者是否均适合选择MIGS等问题仍有待深度探讨。本文结合临床实践经验及国内外临床研究结果,重新审视MIGS,以期帮助临床医师更从容选择青光眼的治疗方法。The advent of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery(MIGS)has broadened the therapeutic options for managing glaucoma.In recent years,MIGS procedures targeting the trabecular meshwork-Schlemm′s canal aqueous outflow resistance site have garnered significant attention.This focus has extended to the pathophysiological changes occurring within the aqueous outflow pathway.However,questions persist regarding the efficacy of near-peripheral or peripheral trabeculotomy in achieving the anticipated reduction of outflow resistance and the suitability of MIGS surgery for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.By integrating clinical experience with pertinent clinical research,this paper advocates for a reevaluation of MIGS procedures to aid clinicians in making informed decisions regarding various glaucoma surgical interventions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158