中医药临床研究类科技成果评价指标体系研究  

Research on Evaluation Index System of Scientific and Technological Achievements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research

作　　者：赖鸿皓 郭继华 尤良震 王伽伯 刘存志[6] 刘玥[7] 刘宝利[8] 孙鑫[9] 李慧[10,11] 杨忠奇[12] 季光[13] 赵林华[14] 赵晖[15] 商洪才[4] 曾芳 魏戌[17] 张霄潇[3] 葛龙 LAI Honghao;GUO Jihua;YOU Liangzhen;WANG Jiabo;LIU Cunzhi;LIU Yue;LIU Baoli;SUN Xin;LI Hui;YANG Zhongqi;JI Guang;ZHAO Linhua;ZHAO Hui;SHANG Hongcai;ZENG Fang;WEI Xu;ZHANGXiaoxiao;GE Long(Evidence-based Social Science Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Health Management and Development Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;China Association of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China;Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education,Beijing Dongzhimen Hospital,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,China;School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;School of Acupuncture,Moxibustion&Tuina,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China;Cardiovascular Disease Centre,Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences,Beijing 100091,China;Department of Research,Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100010,China;Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;Institute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Industry,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Nanchang 330029,China;Department of Cardiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405,China;Institute of Digestive Diseases,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200032,China;Department of Endocrinology,Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100053,China;China Center for Evidence-based Traditional Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;Acupuncture&Brain Research Center,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Chengdu 610000,China;Academic Development Office,Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences,Beijing 100102,C

机构地区：[1]兰州大学公共卫生学院循证社会科学研究中心,甘肃省兰州市730000 [2]兰州大学公共卫生学院卫生管理与健康发展研究中心,甘肃省兰州市730000 [3]中华中医药学会,北京市100029 [4]北京中医药大学东直门医院中医内科学教育部重点实验室,北京市100700 [5]首都医科大学中医药学院,北京市100069 [6]北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院,北京市100029 [7]中国中医科学院西苑医院心血管病中心,北京市100091 [8]首都医科大学附属北京中医医院科研处,北京市100010 [9]四川大学华西医院中国循证医学中心,四川省成都市610041 [10]中国中医科学院中药研究所,北京市100700 [11]中国中医科学院中医药健康产业研究所,江西省南昌市330029 [12]广州中医药大学第一附属医院心内科,广东省广州市510405 [13]上海中医药大学脾胃病研究所,上海市200032 [14]中国中医科学院广安门医院内分泌科,北京市100053 [15]中国中医科学院中国中医药循证医学中心,北京市100700 [16]成都中医药大学针灸脑科学研究中心,四川省成都市610000 [17]中国中医科学院望京医院学术发展处,北京市100102 [18]甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室,甘肃省兰州市730000

出　　处：《中国全科医学》2024年第27期3403-3410,共8页Chinese General Practice

基　　金：中华中医药学会求实项目(2022-QSDXWT-05);中国科协科学技术创新部科技评估评价专项。

摘　　要：背景开展好中医药科技成果评价工作对推动中医药创新发展意义重大。既往的中医药科技成果评价常套用笼统的评价方法,造成指标不适用、维度单一等问题,不利于科学、全面地反映成果的多元价值。因此,新时期中医药科技成果评价亟需建立分类、多维度的评价指标体系。目的遵循我国新时期科技评价要求,针对中医药临床研究类科技成果,建立体现中医药规律、突出中医药优势的科学、分类、可靠、全面的评价指标体系。方法本研究开始于2022年11月,完成于2023年5月。基于对相关文献资料的梳理分析,结合专题小组讨论,初步形成指标框架;通过两轮德尔菲专家咨询,确定评价指标和评价要点;采用层次分析法,计算指标权重。结果最终确定的中医药临床研究类科技成果评价指标体系包含门槛指标10条,一级指标4条,二级指标17条,评价要点17条。经检验,两轮德尔菲法实施中专家积极系数均为100%,权威系数分别为0.94和0.93,各级指标Kendall's W一致性检验双侧检验显著性P值均<0.05,表明专家积极程度、权威程度高,专家意见一致性强,咨询结果可靠。结论本研究围绕中医药临床研究类科技成果评价,构建了一套科学、合理、可靠、易操作的指标体系。指标涵盖范围广,权重区分度高,具有一定中医特色,有利于在全面考虑成果多元价值的同时凸显核心优势。同时,配套建设的评价要点一定程度上增强了指标体系的可操作性,可能为相关评价活动提供潜在参考。Background The effective evaluation of scientific and technological achievements in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)is of great significance in promoting the innovative development of TCM.Previous evaluations of scientific and technological achievements in TCM often used a generalized evaluation method,leading to problems such as inappropriate indicators and limited dimensions,which is not conducive to reflecting the multiple values of achievements in a scientific and comprehensive way.Consequently,there is an urgent need to establish categorized and multi-dimensional evaluation index system for the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements in TCM in the new period.Objective To establish a scientific,categorized,reliable and comprehensive evaluation index system that reflects the principles of TCM and highlights its unique advantages aiming at the scientific and technological achievements in TCM,in accordance with the contemporary requirements for scientific and technological evaluation in China.Methods This study began in November 2022 and was completed in May 2023.A preliminary index framework was developed through literature review and focus group discussions.Delphi expert consultation was then conducted over two rounds to determine the evaluation indexes and points.The hierarchical analysis method was used to calculate the weight of each index.Results The final evaluation index system of scientific and technological achievements in TCM clinical research comprised 10 threshold indicators,4 primary indicators,17 secondary indicators,and 17 evaluation points.After testing,the positive coefficient of experts in both rounds of Delphi method implementation was 100%,the authority coefficient was 0.94 and 0.93,respectively.The Kendall's W consistency test for each level of indicators yielded two-tailed significance(P<0.05),indicated high levels of expert positivity and authority,strong consistency of expert opinion,and reliable consulting results.Conclusion This study constructs a scientific,reasonable

关 键 词：中医药标准化 中医药 评价指标 科技成果 分类评价 

分 类 号：R2-65[医药卫生—中医学]