乡村振兴与共同富裕耦合协调度的统计检验  

Statistical Test of Coupling Coordination Degree of Rural Revitalization and Common Prosperity

作　　者：张曾莲[1] 邓文悦扬 Zhang Zenglian;Deng Wenyueyang(School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Science and Technology,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学经济管理学院,北京100083

出　　处：《统计与决策》2024年第10期63-68,共6页Statistics & Decision

基　　金：北京市教育科学“十四五”规划重点课题(AGAA22053)。

摘　　要：中国不同地区在实现共同富裕、乡村振兴的过程中存在显著差异,亟须深入探究其演进规律。文章以2011—2021年中国30个省份的数据为基础,深入研究乡村振兴与共同富裕的耦合协调特征。运用熵权法、Dagum基尼系数及其分解、Kernel密度估计、收敛模型等研究方法,揭示了二者耦合协调度区域差异的主要来源以及收敛性。研究结果显示:东部地区的乡村振兴水平、共同富裕水平以及二者的耦合协调度均最高,东北、中部和西部地区依次递减;全国和四个地区的耦合协调度均存在σ收敛特征,其中,东部、中部和西部地区还表现出β收敛特征。There are significant differences between different regions in China in the process of achieving common prosperity and rural revitalization,and it is urgent to further explore the evolution law.Based on the data of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2021,this paper deeply studies the coupling coordination characteristics of rural revitalization and common prosperity.Entropy weight method,Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition,Kernel density estimation and convergence model are used to reveal the main sources of regional differences of the coupling coordination degree between the two and convergence.The results show that the rural revitalization level,the common prosperity level and coupling coordination degree between the two are the highest in the eastern region,followed by the northeastern,central and western regions.There isσconvergence in the coupling coordination degree of the whole country and the four regions,with the eastern,central and western regions also exhibitingβconvergence.

关 键 词：乡村振兴 共同富裕 分布动态 空间差异 空间收敛 

分 类 号：F320[经济管理—产业经济] D601[政治法律—政治学]