检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王慧东 WANG Huidong
出 处:《保险职业学院学报》2024年第2期11-17,共7页Journal of Insurance Professional College
基 金:安徽省哲学社会科学基金项目“农村互助养老服务质量评价与提升路径研究”(AHSKY2022D111)。
摘 要:养老模式与老年人抑郁的关系是老龄化社会面临的重要公共课题。本研究基于2018年中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查(CLHLS)数据,以家庭养老为参照项,对抑郁指数较高的独居养老和机构养老进行异质性分析和路径分析,旨在实证探究养老模式对老年人抑郁的影响。研究发现:相较于家庭养老,选择机构养老的老年人抑郁指数最高,选择独居养老的老年人抑郁指数次之;独居养老、机构养老通过照料支持和情感支持能有效改善老年人抑郁情况。此外,独居养老和机构养老尤其对女性、低龄、没有自理能力和缺乏社会保障的老年人有更强的心理抑郁负面影响。本文在实证分析后提出了针对性的对策建议。The relationship between the elderly care mode and depression in the elderly is an important public issue facing an aging society.Based on the 2018 data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey(CLHLS),this study conducted heterogeneous analysis and pathway analysis of high depression index among elderly individuals living alone and those in institutional care,with family care as a reference,aiming at empirically explore the impact of care mode on depression in the elderly.The study found that compared to family care,elderly people choosing institutional care had the highest depression index,followed by those choosing to live alone.Living alone and institutional care can effectively improve the depressive symptoms of elderly people through care giving support and emotional support.In addition,living alone and institutional care have a stronger negative psychological impact on women,younger age groups,those who are unable to take care of themselves,and those lacking social security.This paper provides targeted policy recommendations after empirical analysis.
关 键 词:养老模式 老年人抑郁症 积极老龄化 中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49