论综合认定法在帮信罪“明知”认定中的运用  

Application of the Comprehensive Identification to“Knowing”Identification in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities

作　　者：梅贺 钱晓伟 MEI He;QIAN Xiaowei(High People’s Court of Shandong Provincial,Jinan Shangdong,250101,China;School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Changning Shanghai,200050,China)

机构地区：[1]山东省高级人民法院,山东济南250101 [2]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海长宁200050

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期91-98,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“职务犯罪指定管辖问题研究”(2023BFX011)。

摘　　要：信息技术的迅猛发展使得帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪(以下简称“帮信罪”)呈现出了网络犯罪的新特点。学界、实务界多将司法解释中的帮信罪“明知”认定条款视作推定,实属理解偏差。通过对条款性质的拨乱反正和对印证证明的剖析,提出了基于补助证据进行综合认定的方法,以期解决帮信罪主观“明知”认定的实践难题。综合认定主张摒弃证明标准印证化的观念,但并不排斥印证方法的使用;其不是印证证明的补充,也不存在适用的先后顺序。在综合认定中,裁判者应始终坚持法定证明标准,通过补助证据显示出的细节信息,结合经验法则综合且审慎地认定“明知”,从而作出公正裁决,维护司法公信力。The academic and practical circles regard the“knowing”identification clause in judicial interpretation as presump-tion,which is a deviation in understanding.Problems such as over-reliance on objective behavior have also appeared in the application of the identification clause in practice.By analyzing the nature of the clauses and the limitations of proof,this paper puts forward the method of comprehensive identification based on supplementary evidence aiming to solve the practical prob-lem of subjective“knowing”identification of the crime of assisting information network criminal activities.Comprehensive identification proposes to abandon the concept of corroboration of proof standards,but does not exclude the use of corrobora-tion methods,which is not a supplement to corroboration proofs,and takes no order in application.Therefore,the judge should always adhere to the legal standard of proof,and prudently identify“knowing”via the details in the corroboration evidence combined with the rule of thumb.

关 键 词：帮信罪 认定明知 印证证明 综合认定 补助证据 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]