论精神控制行为的侵权法规制  

Regulation of Mind Control Based on the Tort Law

作　　者：肖雪 XIAO Xue(People’s Court of Guang’an District,Guang’an Sichuan,638500,China)

机构地区：[1]广安市广安区人民法院,四川广安638500

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期99-106,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：重庆市社会科学规划英才计划项目“国家治理现代化视阈下民法典的中国特色、实践特色、时代特色研究”(2022YC057)

摘　　要：近年来,精神控制引发了一系列社会问题。从先行行为与交往安全义务理论的视角看,精神控制行为具有违法性,是类型性侵权行为,故在损害后果要件中应对纯粹性精神损害予以认可。从相当因果关系理论的视角看,精神控制行为与纯粹精神损害及生命健康等人身损害具有因果关系,故在行为人具有故意或过失的主观过错且不具有免责事由之际,行为人实施精神控制侵害他人权益构成侵权,需承担侵权责任。总之,精神世界并非法外空间,行为人实施精神控制,因故意或过失造成受害人损害,行为人应承担侵权责任。Mind control has caused a series of social problems in recent years.This article demonstrates the constitution of the tort liability of mind control from the four elements of tort liability:tort,damage result,causation,and fault,and analyzes whether the actor can be exempted from liability from the subject matter of exemption.The behavior of mind control includes mind control,general tort and abetting and helping the controlled person to implement self-inflict behavior.According to the theory of antecedent behavior and complete obligation of communication,the behavior of mind control is illegal and is a type of tort.Mind control behavior causes harm to the victim’s psychology and spirit,and further leads to material damage results such as life and health.The causal relationship between behavior and damage can be confirmed by using the theory of adequate causation.Therefore,when the actor can be identified as having caused injury whether by intention or by fault to the victim through mind control,he has fault and bears tort liability.

关 键 词：精神控制 先行行为理论 纯粹精神损害 相当因果关系 公序良俗 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]