医疗机构行使紧急救治权的法律风险分析及对策——以《中华人民共和国民法典》第1220条为例  

Legal Risk Analysis and Countermeasures of Medical Institutions Exercising Emergency Rescue Right:Based on Article 1220 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

作　　者：冯嘉旻 龚波[1] Feng Jiamin;Gong Bo(Health Law and Policy Research Center,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,511436,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]广州医科大学卫生法治与政策研究中心,广东广州511436

出　　处：《中国医院管理》2024年第6期83-86,共4页Chinese Hospital Management

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国民法典》第1220条是专门为医疗机构与医务人员抢救生命垂危的患者而制定的,旨在化解医疗机构的应急抢救权利与病患的知情同意权利之间的矛盾。鉴于相应法律法规的欠缺、组织结构的欠佳和体系的漏洞等问题,医疗机构在实施紧急救治的时候有可能存在一定的风险。梳理和考察现行法中关于医疗机构紧急救治的相关规定,发现有必要优化相关法律条款及司法解释,建立健全以伦理委员会为核心的病例评价体系,完善医疗救助基金与保险制度,避免医务人员陷于“情与理”的困境。Article 1220 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China is specifically formulated for medical institutions and medical personnel to rescue patients with life-threatening conditions,aiming to adjust the contradiction between the right of emergency rescue in medical institutions and the right of informed consent of patients.In view of the lack of relevant laws and regulations,poor organizational structure and loopholes in the system,medical institutions may have certain risks when implementing emergency treatment.After sorting out and examining the relevant provisions of the current law on emergency treatment in medical institutions,it is found that it is necessary to optimize the relevant legal provisions and judicial interpretations,establish and improve the case evaluation system with ethics committee as the core,improve the medical assistance fund and insurance system,and avoid the dilemma of“feeling and reason”for medical personnel.

关 键 词：医疗机构 紧急救治权 医务人员 知情同意权 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]