检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张颂 何培育[1] ZHANG Song;HE Peiyu(Chongqing Intellectual Property School,Chongqing University of Technology,Chongqing 400054,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆理工大学重庆知识产权学院,重庆400054
出 处:《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》2024年第5期152-162,共11页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目“共享经济平台用户个人信息保护法律问题研究”(22XJC820001);重庆市教委人文社科青年项目“敏感个人信息侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的构建研究”(23SKGH267)。
摘 要:在信息化已成为当今时代潮流的背景下,侵犯敏感个人信息的案(事)件频发,但依照现行法律法规却难以有效规制。我国刚颁布的《个人信息保护法》在借鉴西方发达国家(地区)的先进法律保护机制的基础上,结合中国国情在立法理念、界定标准、保护机制等方面有所发展和突破,对敏感个人信息特别关注,不过在具体法律条文上还有完善的空间。建议从进一步划分敏感信息类别、强化信息主体的权利、细化信息处理者的义务、建立惩罚性赔偿制度以及引入独立的第三方监管机制的路径出发,优化完善敏感个人信息的法律保护机制。In the context of information technology becoming the trend of the times,cases of infringing sensitive personal information are frequent,but it is difficult to effectively regulate them according to current laws and regulations.The recently promulgated Personal Information Protection Law in China pays special attention to sensitive personal information.Based on the advanced legal protection mechanisms of developed Western countries(regions) and China's national conditions,the law has achieved development and breakthroughs in legislative concepts,definition standards,and protection mechanisms.However,there is still room for improvement in specific legal provisions.It is recommended to try to further classify sensitive information categories,strengthen the rights of information subjects,refine the obligations of information processors,establish punitive compensation systems,and introduce independent third-party regulatory mechanisms to optimize and improve the legal protection mechanism for sensitive personal information.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49