检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:倪晨旭 彭洋漾 郭诗怡 王震[4] Ni Chenxu;Peng Yangyang;Guo Shiyi;Wang Zhen(School of Economics,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China;School of Economics,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 102206,China;The Center for Economic Research,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China;Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100836,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学经济学院,北京102488 [2]中央财经大学经济学院,北京102206 [3]山东大学经济研究院,山东济南250100 [4]中国社会科学院经济研究所,北京100836
出 处:《财经研究》2024年第2期93-107,共15页Journal of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA043);中国社会科学院院际合作课题(2021YJHZ001)。
摘 要:文章基于中国老年社会追踪调查数据以及手动收集的老年优待政策数据,采用交叠双重差分模型实证检验了老年优待政策对老年群体健康状况的影响和作用机制。结果表明,老年优待政策通过经济效应、服务效应、认同效应及社会互动效应等多维途径,对老年人的生理、心理以及社会适应健康产生了显著的促进作用。异质性分析发现,农村和教育程度较低的老年群体可获得更大程度的健康效益,表明老年优待政策具有促进健康均等化的潜力。在公共服务供给水平较高的城市,老年优待政策对老年人身心健康的积极影响更为突出,这进一步强调了充足的基础设施和资源条件对社会保障政策有效性和精准性的重要性。文章还分析了地方性老年优待政策的实施情况,发现部分地区仍存在户籍限制,但即使对外地户籍老人,老年优待政策也呈现出显著的身心健康改善效果,这可能与良好的本地社会氛围和丰富的社会互动机会有关。文章结论为决策层面完善现行老年优待政策提供了有力证据支持,从差异化服务供给、改善区域间公平性等方面提供了政策启示。Elderly preference policies are public policies designed for the public service needs of the elderly group,which directly concern the health and quality of life of the elderly.This paper is the first to conduct a comprehensive empirical study on China's elderly preference policies from an economic perspective.It focuses on examining their impact on the physical,mental,and social health of the elderly,proposes and tests the four mechanism channels of economic effect,service effect,identity effect,and social interaction effect,and conducts a cost-benefit analysis from a health perspective,enriching the existing literature on the implementation effectiveness of elderly preference policies.Using the staggered DID model,this paper finds that elderly preference policies significantly improve the self-rated health status of the elderly,reduce the risk of depression,and enhance social adaptability and life happiness.Mechanism analysis shows that the policies mainly improve the physical and mental health level of the elderly by enhancing their consumption ability and optimizing their consumption structure,improving the accessibility of public services,creating a social atmosphere of respecting and caring for the elderly,and providing more social interaction opportunities.Heterogeneity analysis finds that rural and low-educated elderly groups can obtain greater health benefits,and in cities with better public service conditions,the policy effect is more prominent.This paper also explores the implementation of local elderly preference policies,and finds that some regions still have household registration restrictions.But even for the elderly with non-local household registration,the policies also show a significant physical and mental health improvement effect,which may be related to the local good social atmosphere and rich social interaction.The cost-benefit analysis shows that as long as the annual special fiscal input for elderly preference policies is controlled within a certain level,the policies can achieve significa
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.244.16