检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋雨彤 王旭 Jiang Yutong;Wang Xu(Key Laboratory of Evidence Science,Ministry of Education,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China;Felony Procuratorial Evidence Research Center,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室,北京100088 [2]中国政法大学重罪检察证据分析研究基地,北京100088 [3]法大法庭科学技术鉴定研究所,北京100192
出 处:《中国法医学杂志》2024年第2期147-152,156,共7页Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
基 金:教育部人文社会科学规划项目(2022-22YJA820022);司法部司法鉴定重点实验室开放课题(KF202322);司法部司法行政(法律服务)案例理论委托课题(2022);上海市现场物证重点实验室开放课题(2017XCWZK19)。
摘 要:鉴定意见在医疗纠纷案件处理中具有重要的技术支撑作用,现阶段,我国亟需厘清医疗损害鉴定的理论与操作进路。本文系统梳理医疗损害鉴定的核心要点,并以SF/T 0097-2021《医疗损害司法鉴定指南》为视角,指出:医疗过错的评判原则、因果关系分析、医疗过错的原因力评定是医疗损害鉴定的核心要点。作者提出:(1)医疗过错的评判原则应以具体规定为基本标准,以注意义务为实务标准,以告知义务为伦理标准;(2)针对因果关系分析,需区分直接因果关系,复杂因果关系,相当因果关系等;(3)原因力的具体分类包括全部原因、主要原因、同等原因、次要原因、轻微原因及无原因。本文对上述三方面内容分别从标准条文、鉴定思路、操作要点层次清晰地给予了进路解析,力求厘清关键问题、构建科学的理论与操作模式,为司法鉴定提供有益的参考。Forensic appraisal opinions play an important role in the verdicts of medical disputes.At present,it is very urgent to clarify the theories and approaches of the medical damage appraisal in China.This paper systematically reviewed the core aspects of medical damage appraisal and analyzed them through the lens of SF/T 0097-2021"Guidance for judicial expertise of medical malpractice".Three keypoints had been identified:the principles for evaluating medical malpractice,the causation analysis,and the assessment of causative potency in medical malpractice.To be specific:(1)Medical malpractice evaluation should take concrete provisions as the basis standard,duty of care as the practical standard,and informed consent as the ethical standard;(2)For the analysis of causality,it is necessary to distinguish between direct,complex and equivalent causalities;(3)The specific categorization of causality includes sole cause,primary cause,co-equal cause,secondary cause,minor cause and non-cause.This paper provides a clear elaboration of the above three aspects from the perspectives of standard clauses,appraisal methodology,and operational guidelines,aiming to elucidate the key issues,establish scientifically theoretical and operational models,and offer constructive references for forensic identification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158