检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王炬成[1,3] 张世超[2] 戴震 袁飞晖 朱小敏 WANG Ju-cheng;ZHANG Shi-chao;DAI Zhen;YUAN Fei-hui;ZHU Xiao-min(Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212003,China;Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200137,China;Jiangsu Modern Shipbuilding Technology Co.,Ltd.,Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212003,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏科技大学,江苏镇江212003 [2]上海外高桥造船有限公司,上海200137 [3]江苏现代造船技术有限公司,江苏镇江212003
出 处:《船海工程》2024年第3期23-28,共6页Ship & Ocean Engineering
基 金:工信部项目(工信部联装函〔2019〕331号)。
摘 要:针对船舶设计过程中二维图纸和三维模型之间缺乏有效关联关系的现状,开展二维图纸驱动三维模型的方法研究。开展常用二维原理图绘制软件CAD和SP P&ID的对比分析;针对CAD软件和SP P&ID两种软件输出的不同形式的二维原理图,分别开展二维原理图驱动三维模型的方法研究,分析二维原理图驱动三维建模的流程,研究二维原理图驱动三维建模的机理,解决二维原理图和三维模型之间数据分离的问题,提高船舶设计效率。In response to the lack of effective correlation between 2D drawings and 3D models in the process of ship design,research on the method of driving 3D models with 2D drawings was conducted.A comparative analysis of commonly used 2D schematic drawing software CAD and SP P&ID was carried out.For different forms of 2D schematic diagrams output by CAD software and SP P&ID software,the methods of driving 3D models with 2D schematic diagrams was researched,the process of driving 3D modeling with 2D schematic diagrams was analyzed,and the mechanism of driving 3D modeling with 2D schematic diagrams was studied to solve the problem of data separation between 2D schematic diagrams and 3D models,thereby improving the efficiency of ship design.
分 类 号:U662.2[交通运输工程—船舶及航道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.107.69