2种医院感染现患率调查方法调查结果分析  

Analysis of the survey results of two methods for nosocomial infection prevalence survey

作　　者：何倩[1] 赵红 张士杰 徐玉菲[1] 李晓娜 HE Qian;ZHAO Hong;ZHANG Shi-jie;XU Yu-fei;LI Xiao-na(The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,Hefei Anhui 230031,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽中医药大学第一附属医院,安徽合肥230031

出　　处：《中国消毒学杂志》2024年第4期271-274,共4页Chinese Journal of Disinfection

基　　金：安徽省自然科学基金(1908085QC90)。

摘　　要：目的比较传统人工调查和信息化调查2种医院感染现患率调查方法的调查结果,为进一步改进现患率调查方法提供参考依据。方法选取某院2018年11月28日所有住院患者为研究对象,比较2种医院感染现患率调查方法的调查结果,确定更佳的现患率调查方法。结果此次调查住院患者2239例,所得医院感染现患率分别为3.22%和2.90%。传统人工调查和信息化调查所得结果基本一致。信息化调查的特异度、总符合率、阳性预测值和阳性似然比均高于传统人工调查。结论现患率调查以信息化调查为主,通过人工调查进行质控,有利于进一步提高医院感染监测水平。Objective To compare the survey results of two methods of nosocomial infection prevalence survey,and to provide a reference for further improving the prevalence survey method.Methods All hospitalized patients in a hospital on November 28,2018 were selected as the research subjects,and the results of two methods for nosocomial infection prevalence survey were compared to determine a better prevalence survey method.Results This survey included 2239 hospitalized patients.The prevalence rates of nosocomial infection obtained from traditional manual survey and informationbased survey were 3.22%and 2.90%,respectively.The results obtained by traditional manual survey and information-based survey were basically the same.The specificity,total coincidence rate,positive predictive value,and positive likelihood ratio of information-based survey were all higher than those of traditional manual survey.Conclusion The prevalence survey is mainly based on information-based survey,and the quality control through manual survey is helpful to further improve the level of hospital infection surveillance.

关 键 词：医院感染 现患率调查 人工调查 信息化调查 

分 类 号：R181.32[医药卫生—流行病学]