论《档案法》与《刑法》的衔接  

The Convergence Between the Archival Law and the Criminal Law

作　　者：谷永超[1] GU Yongchao(Law School of Henan University,Kaifeng 475001,China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,开封475001

出　　处：《档案学通讯》2024年第3期13-18,共6页Archives Science Bulletin

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“国家治理效能提升与人权保障研究———以人权刑事法治保障中的新问题为视角”(20JJD820003)。

摘　　要：《档案法》与《刑法》存在衔接不畅的问题,尽管档案法犯罪条款通过明示和暗示的方式发挥了提示引证、限定刑法处罚范围及解释参照等功能,发挥了联通《档案法》与《刑法》的作用,但二法衔接仍存在诸多不足。二法衔接问题在《档案法》全面修订之后有所缓和,但仍存在概念内涵不一致、实行行为类型不明确、犯罪圈划定立场不统一等问题,档案法注重概念思维与刑法注重类型思维的冲突尤为明显。因此,有必要在《档案法》中设立真正的附属刑法,同时以“群+类型”行为为核心整合档案法犯罪条款与档案犯罪,从形式和实体两方面推动二法的顺畅衔接。Although the criminal provisions of the Archival Law have,explicitly or implicitly,played an important role in limiting the punishment range and hint function,there still have some shortcomings.The problem of convergence between the two laws has been alleviated after the Archival Law completely overhauled.But the problems of inconsistent core concepts,unclear behaviors types and divided on the delimitation of criminal circles still exist and the conflict between archival law conceptual thinking and criminal law categorized thinking is especially serious.It is necessary to construct an accessory Criminal Law in the Archival Law,and integrate its criminal provisions with the Archival Crime through the“group&type”behavior,so as to achieve the convergence of the two laws from both formal and substantive aspects.

关 键 词：档案犯罪 档案法 附属刑法 

分 类 号：D912.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]