基础性权力与嵌入式自主:论新印度教特性政治在印地语区的政治基础  

Infrastructural Power and Embedded Autonomy:Neo-Hindutva’Political Infrastructure in Hindi Belt

作　　者：吴孟克 Wu Mengke

机构地区：[1]复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院

出　　处：《印度洋经济体研究》2024年第3期1-24,152,共25页Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“印度教民族主义世界观及其对当代印度外交影响研究”(项目批准号:22CZJ007)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：印地语区的政治状况从根本上决定了印度政治格局。这一地区的社会特性必定对印度国家能力构成限制。直到独立后很长时期,亲族封建制都是印地语区主导性政治经济制度,其也成为现代印度国家权力的基础结构。然而,印地语区的亲族封建制自1950年代以来遭到农民政治和落后种姓先后冲击并最终瓦解。自2000年代以来,新印度教特性政治逐渐通过“发展”和“日常社群主义”的双重策略控制印地语区,这助推莫迪政府在中央执政。印地语区政治高度的竞争性也促使印人党政府推出反华政策,然而印人党政权的阶级属性和印地语区政治特性始终限制着印度对华政策选项。The Hindi Belt holds paramount political significance in India and its sociological makeup profoundly influences India’s state capacity and imposes limitations on state autonomy.Long after India’s independence,kin-feudated remained the dominant political-economic institution in the Hindi belt.Since 1950s,the emergence of Kisan politics and backward caste politics has significantly challenged the kin-feudal polity,contributing to the decline of this institution.Since 2000s,New Hindutva politics has gradually gained control of the Hindi belt through“development”and“Everyday Communalism”,paving the way for the ascent of the Modi government in New Delhi.The heightened competitiveness of Hindi belt politics has pushed the BJP government to move towards a hardline China policy to secure time for consolidating its political basis.The class nature of the BJP regime and the political dynamics of the Hindi belt impose limitations on India’s China Policy.

关 键 词：印度 新印度教特性 身份政治 选举政治 组织唯物主义 

分 类 号：B982[哲学宗教—宗教学] D735.1[政治法律—政治学] G135.1[政治法律—中外政治制度] H71[文化科学] K351.5[语言文字]