检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘林琳 胡苑[1] LIU Linlin;HU Yuan
出 处:《城市发展研究》2024年第4期70-73,共4页Urban Development Studies
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“超大城市绿色低碳转型的法律问题研究”(2023110242)。
摘 要:后巴黎时代,全球气候治理主体呈现多元化趋势。城市在全球气候变化治理中实现主体化转型,有力补充了这一过程中国家行为的不足。以城市气候治理经验跨国传播为基础的主动型治理(横向)、以城市与气候变化国际组织上下贯通为主导的互动性治理(纵向)和以中央权威命令下城市气候实验为主的强制性治理(科层)是城市参与全球气候变化治理的三种主要形态。然而,这一行为可能受到上级治理主体的权力限制和城市内部治理主体异质性的困境。对此,我国需要依托超大特大城市气候实验,结合规划法整合城市气候治理措施,推进城市气候治理的国际互动,以系统性优化城市参与全球气候变化治理的具体路径。Global climate governance(GCG) subjects are diversifying in the post-Paris era. Cities are transforming their subjectivities in GCG, complementing the inadequacy of state action. Proactive governance based on transnational dissemination of cities′ climate governance experiences(horizontal), interactive governance dominated by up-and-down communication between cities and international organisations on climate change(vertical), and coercive governance dominated by cities′ climate experiments under the orders of central authority(sectional) are the three main forms of cities′ participation in GCG. However, this may be constrained by the power limitations of higher governance subjects and the dilemma of heterogeneity of governance subjects within cities. In this regard, China needs to rely on mega-city climate experiments, integrate urban climate governance measures in combination with planning laws, and promote international interactions in urban climate governance, in order to systematically optimise the specific paths of urban participation in GCG.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.43.72