检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵勇健 ZHAO Yongjian
机构地区:[1]北京市城市规划设计研究院详细规划所
出 处:《城乡规划》2024年第2期66-74,共9页Urban and Rural Planning
摘 要:随着我国“五级三类”国土空间规划体系建立,国家空间治理体系现代化改革总体框架基本明确,并将实施自然资源兼管和全域国土空间管制作为重点内容。文章从对国土空间管制体系的理解入手,聚焦美国、英国、日本的国土空间管制体系特征,用比较的视野,分析三国在规划体系、法规制度、层级重点和微观层级的典型管制手段。结合国内国土空间改革逐步进入详细规划层次的情况,为国内空间管制层级体系、法规制度和详细规划管制方法提供启示与借鉴。Along with the establishment of the "five-level three-class" territorial spatial planning system, the overall framework for modernizing the national space governance system has been basically defined. It also takes the implementation of natural resources management and the implementation of the whole territorial spatial regulation as the key content. Starting from the understanding of territorial spatial regulation system, this paper focuses on the characteristics of territorial spatial regulation system of the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan. Taking a comparative perspective, the paper analyzes the planning typical regulatory measures of the three countries in terms of planning systems, regulatory frameworks, hierarchical priorities, and micro-level control. Combining the gradual progression of China's domestic territorial spatial reform into the detailed planning, the paper puts forward the inspiration of international experience regarding the domestic spatial regulation hierarchical system regulatory frameworks, and detailed planning regulatory methods.
关 键 词:国际比较 国土空间管制 层级体系 法规制度 管制手段
分 类 号:TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.110.116