法律体系阶层构造论为什么难以成立?——兼及宪法的“法律辨识”功能  

Why Stufenbau Theory of Legal System is Impossible?

作　　者：徐舒浩 Xu Shuhao

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《法治社会》2024年第3期76-89,共14页Law-Based Society

摘　　要：阶层构造论认为,法律体系中的规范以阶层的方式组成体系,某个法律体系之所以区别于其他法律体系而能够被独立识别出来,且其组成成员能够被认为归属于该体系而具有效力,是因为通过效力链条的递归,该体系中的所有规范都直接或者间接地与同一个规范建立条件关系。阶层构造论将条件关系分成效力链条上的授权关系与内容上的废止关系,但废止关系和授权关系有着巨大的、不可调和的差异,并且阶层构造论无法在同一个解释框架内同时安置授权关系和废止关系。对此的出路是放弃阶层构造论,承认法律规范的身份取决于辨识上的同源性,而非授权上的同源性,并且承认在辨识关系中,宪法扮演着总体性法律辨识规则的角色。According to Stufenbau theory,norms in the legal system form a system in a hierarchical way,and the reason why a legal system is different from other legal systems can be identified independently,and its members can be considered to belong to the system and have effect,because through the recursion of the effectiveness chain,all norms in the system directly or indirectly establish conditional relations with the same norm.The theory of Stufenbau divides the conditional relationship into the authorization relationship in the validity chain and the abolition relationship in the content,but there is a huge and irreconcilable difference between the authorization relationship and abolition relationship,and the Stufenbau theory cannot place them simultaneously within the same interpretation framework.The way out for this is to abandon the theory of Stufenbau,admitting that the identity of legal norms depends on the homology in identification,rather than the homology in authorization,and admitting that the Constitution plays an overall role of the legal identification.

关 键 词：法律位阶 法律体系 效力链条 宪法功能 废止关系 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]