双须光电法分梳绒测长仪与手排法的测试结果对比  

Comparison of test results between double whisker length measurement method and hand row method

作　　者：孙佳慧 马静涛 苏健 钟跃崎[1] 沈华[1] 王府梅[1] SUN Jiahui;MA Jingtao;SU Jian;ZHONG Yueqi;SHEN Hua;WANG Fumei(College of Textiles,Donghua University,Shanghai 201620,China;Inner Mongolia Fiber Inspection Bureau,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010060,China;Tongbiao Standard Technical Service Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200233,China)

机构地区：[1]东华大学纺织学院,上海201620 [2]内蒙古自治区纤维检验局,内蒙古呼和浩特010060 [3]通标标准技术服务有限公司,上海200233

出　　处：《东华大学学报（自然科学版）》2024年第3期98-106,共9页Journal of Donghua University(Natural Science)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2232022G-01);国家自然科学基金(51903034)。

摘　　要：研制出双须光电法分梳绒测长系统2.0Z版,利用该仪器测试25种分梳山羊绒试样的纤维长度,同时采用GB 18267—2013中的手排法测试上述试样的纤维长度,根据两种测试方法所得结果对比验证2.0Z版测长系统的精确度和稳定性。结果表明,采用手排法测试分梳绒长度时,取样存在样间差异,并且手排法测试样品量少、随机误差高,而双须光电法测试结果稳定。双须光电法分梳绒测长系统2.0 Z版和手排法长度测试的一致性较高,特别是平均长度指标的平均偏倚小于2 mm,相关系数均大于0.8,表明分梳绒测长系统2.0Z版的精确度高。A version 2.0Z testing system using the double whisker photoelectric method was developed.Twenty-five kinds of carding cashmere samples were tested by double whisker photoelectric method.The accuracy and stability of the 2.0Z test system were verified by comparing the test results of the hand row method in GB 18267—2013.The results show that there are differences between among samples and the sample size of hand-row method is small,so the random error is high,while the results of the double whisker photoelectric method are relatively stable.The double whisker photoelectric method 2.0Z test system has a high consistency with the hand row method.In particular,the average deviation of the mean length index is less than 2 mm,and the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.8.The double whisker photoelectric method 2.0Z test system has a high accuracy.

关 键 词：双须光电法 手排法 纤维长度 精确度 

分 类 号：TS103.6[轻工技术与工程—纺织工程]