网络型寻衅滋事罪司法认定的现实考察与问题省思  

Realistic Investigation and Reflection on the Judicial Determination of the Cybercrime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble

作　　者：王胜华[1] 周洲 WANG Shenghua;ZHOU Zhou(Law School,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,China)

机构地区：[1]石河子大学法学院,新疆石河子832003

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期71-81,共11页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金资助项目“新时代新疆反恐的成功经验研究”(21BFX063)。

摘　　要：对近年来百余件真实案例的分析表明,网络型寻衅滋事罪的司法认定在司法实践中存在“虚假信息”认定模糊、主观要件认定缺位以及结果要件认定迥异等恣意入罪的问题。为贯彻刑法谦抑和保障人权的理念,有必要对本罪客观要素“虚假信息”之意涵进行法教义学限缩,对本罪主观要素“确实知道”应当根据行为人的实施次数、是否获利以及身份经验等进行综合认定,对本罪结果要件“造成公共秩序严重混乱”应在区分网络场域的前提下进行危害性有无的实质认定,从而避免该罪适用的“口袋化”,实现该罪适用的有理有据有度。The analysis of more than 100 real cases in recent years reveals that there are some problems in judicial practice,such as fuzzy identification of“false information”,absence of subjective element identification and different identification of outcome elements.In order to implement the concept of modesty and protection of human rights in criminal law,it is necessary to specify the meaning of the objective elements—the“false information”,and identify comprehensively the subjective elements—“really knowing”—according to the number of times the perpetrator has committed crimes,whether the perpetrator has profited,and their identity and experience.In order to avoid the pocket-like application of the crime and achieve a reasonable and well-founded one,a substantive determination of whether any harm is caused should be carried out after distinguishing the networkfield for the result element—“causing serious public disorder”.

关 键 词：网络空间 网络型寻衅滋事罪 司法适用 虚假信息 公共场所 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]