危险作业罪罪过形式的确定——过失危险犯理论的再思考  

Determining the Form of Fault for the Crime of Dangerous Operation:Rethinking on the Theory of Negligent Dangerous Crime

作　　者：王磊[1] WANG Lei(Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou Henan 450001)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2024年第3期39-45,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

摘　　要：危险作业罪作为新增罪名,其主观罪过存在着过失说、故意说以及混合罪过说之争。危险作业罪罪过争议问题是过失危险犯理论争议问题在具体各罪上的表现,对过失危险犯理论的正本清源是解决危险作业罪罪过问题的必要条件。过失危险犯否定论者所认为的过失危险犯无法律明文规定、有违结果过失原则、与司法实践相冲突以及无益于犯罪人的特殊预防等理由是存在可商之处的。在刑法中设立过失危险犯,既满足社会治理的需要而具有目正当性,也有助于规范司法实践而践行刑法的基本理念。在承认过失危险犯的基础上,无论是通过主观主义刑法解释还是客观主义刑法解释,都能得出危险作业罪主观过为过失的结论。The crime of dangerous operation,as a newly added crime,has subjective crime that involves disputes about negligence theory,intentional theory and mixed fault theory.The dispute of dangerous operation crime is the manifestation of the theoretical dispute of negligent dangerous crime in each specific case,and a thorough examination of the theory of negligent dangerous crime is necessary to solve the problem of the crime of dangerous operation.The reasons that negligent dangerous crimes,which are considered by the determiners of negligent dangerous crimes,cannot be explicitly stipulated by law,violate the principle of negligent consequences,conflict with judicial practice,and lack special prevention benefits for criminals,are negotiable.However,the establishment of negligent dangerous crime in criminal law not only meets the needs of social governance and has legitimate aims,but also helps to standardize judicial practice and implement the basic concepts of criminal law.On the basis of admitting the negligent dangerous crime,whether through the subjective interpretation of criminal law or the objective interpretation of criminal law,we can draw the conclusion that the subjective fault of the crime of dangerous operation is negligence.

关 键 词：危险作业罪 过失危险犯 过失 刑法解释 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]