检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹灵秋 吴婷 王清林 ZOU Lingqiu;WU Ting;WANG Qingling(Jihua 3515 Leather and Leather Shoe Co.,Ltd.,Luohe 462000,China;Jihua Leather and Leather Shoe Research Institute,Luohe 462000,China)
机构地区:[1]际华三五一五皮革皮鞋有限公司,河南漯河462000 [2]际华皮革皮鞋研究院,河南漯河462000
出 处:《中国皮革》2024年第6期98-101,共4页China Leather
摘 要:随着人们生活水平的普遍提升,鞋靴舒适性成为消费者首要考虑的因素。鞋靴舒适性的评价方法主要分为主观评价法和客观评价法。目前,还未有研究对于舒适性主客观评价方法进行系统的综述分析。本文基于中国知网、万方、维普等中文数据库和Pub Med、Web of Science、Medline等英文数据库,对舒适性的主客观评价方法进行回顾与总结,对其优缺点进行整合与分析,为鞋靴行业舒适性标准的建立提供参考。With the general improvement of peoples living standards,the comfort of shoes and boots has become the primary consideration for consumers.The evaluation methods of shoe comfort are mainly divided into subjective e⁃valuation method and objective evaluation method.At present,there is no systematic review and analysis of the sub⁃jective evaluation and objective evaluation methods of comfort.Based on Chinese databases such as CNKI,Wanfang,VIP and English databases such as Pub Med,Web of Science and Medline,this paper reviewed and summarized the comfort evaluation methods of subjective and objective,and integrated and analyzed their advantages and disadvanta⁃ges of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation methods,in order to provide a reference for the establishment of comfort standards for footwear industry.
分 类 号:TS94[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15