检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚志祥 刘一橦 GONG Zhi-xiang;LIU Yi-tong
机构地区:[1]东北大学秦皇岛分校民族学学院,河北秦皇岛066004
出 处:《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2024年第6期70-77,183,184,共10页Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“中国近现代中华民族共同体文献整理与数据库建设研究”(22JZD024)。
摘 要:以20世纪现代意义“民族”一词的引进与争论为脉络,在中华民族共同体视域下探讨百年来不同时代背景的民族定义成因。梳理新中国成立前的“民族”一词的舶来与争论,探讨了国民政府的民族定义表达、学术界争论的解决路径,以及中国共产党的民族观点及实践逻辑。对于1949年后的民族定义争论及政策实践影响,则着重考察了新中国成立初期民族定义讨论及政策响应和改革开放后中西学术对话语境下民族定义的策略响应。习近平总书记提出的“铸牢中华民族共同体意识”是中国化时代化的马克思主义民族理论的重大原创性论断,指明了新时代把握民族定义的重点和方向。Based on the introduction and controversy surrounding the term “Minzu” in its modern sense during the 20th century,this article examines the factors influencing the definition of Minzu over the past hundred years from the perspective of the community of the Chinese nation.The article discusses pre-1949 discourse and debates over“Minzu”,including how it was conceptualized and articulated by the national government,how academic disputes were resolved,and explores perspectives and practical reasoning regarding “Minzu” of the Communist Party of China.Furthermore,this article focuses on post-1949 deliberations concerning ethnic categorizations and policy implementations.It specifically investigates discussions and policy responses to ethnic classifications during the early periods of P.R.China,as well as strategic approaches to ethnic definitions within academic dialogues between China and the western countries ever since the reform and opening up.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200