基于学科势能的跨学科知识来源识别——以图书情报学为例  

Identification of Interdisciplinary Knowledge Sources Based on Disciplinary Potential Energy:Taking Library and Information Science as an Example

作　　者：徐卫杰 李长玲[1] 王浩[1] 荣国阳 范晴晴 高峰 Xu Weijie;Li Changling;Wang Hao;Rong Guoyang;Fan Qingqing;Gao Feng(School of Information Management,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255049;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072;College of Information Management,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095;Zibo Development Research Institute,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255049)

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学信息管理学院,淄博255049 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072 [3]南京农业大学信息管理学院,南京210095 [4]山东理工大学淄博发展研究院,淄博255049

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2024年第9期89-97,共9页Library and Information Service

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“跨学科知识流动中学科势能动能对学科发展的影响研究”(项目编号:23BTQ053)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]在我国加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系的背景下,探究目标学科主要的知识来源学科,对促进其与其他学科交叉融合,加速其知识理论体系完善具有重要意义。[方法/过程]跨学科引文网络中的知识流动类似于理想流体的流动——由势能高处向低处流动,促进低势能学科的势能增加。引用物理学中的重力势能定理,从引用质量指数和学科地位高度指数两方面构建学科势能模型。以图书情报学为例,计算2012—2016年和2017—2021年两个时间段图书情报学引用跨学科文献所拥有的学科势能及势能差。根据学科势能和势能差的大小,识别图书情报学主要知识来源学科,并探讨知识输入程度的变化趋势。[结果/结论]实证研究发现:管理科学与工程、计算机科学与技术一直是图书情报学主要的知识来源学科;新闻传播学、教育学、应用与理论经济学对图书情报学的知识输入呈增长趋势;自然科学各学科对图书情报学的知识输入相对较少。[Purpose/Significance]In the development of the discipline system,academic system,and discourse system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics,it is of great significance to explore the main knowledge source of the target discipline to promote the cross-fertilization of that with other disciplines and to accelerate its improvement of the knowledge and theory system.[Method/Process]The flow of knowledge in interdisciplinary citation networks is analogous to the flow of an ideal liquid,that is,the potential energy flows from high to low,which can promote an increase of the potential energy in low-potential disciplines.This study invoked the gravitational potential energy theorem in physics to construct the disciplinary potential energy model from two aspects,citation quality index and disciplinary status height index.Taking library and information science as an example,this study calculated the disciplinary potential energy and the potential energy difference after citing interdisciplinary literature in the two periods of 2012-2016 and 2017-2021.Based on the magnitude of disciplinary potential energy and potential energy difference,this study identified the main knowledge source of library and information science and explored the trends in the extent of their knowledge output in it.[Result/Conclusion]The empirical study finds that the disciplines in management science and engineering,and the computer science and technology have been the main knowledge source for library and information science.There is a growing trend in the knowledge input of the disciplines,such as journalism and communication,education,applied and theoretical economics.The disciplines in the natural sciences have relatively little knowledge contribution to library and information science.

关 键 词：学科势能 跨学科知识流动 知识来源 图书情报学 

分 类 号：G250[文化科学—图书馆学]