ChatGPT的法律人格认定与生成内容性质探讨  

A Discussion on the Legal Personality Identification of ChatGPT and the Nature of its Generated Content

作　　者：蔡镇疆[1] 车宇璐 CAI Zhen-jiang;CHE Yu-lu(Law School,Xinjiang University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830046)

机构地区：[1]新疆大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830046

出　　处：《新疆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期96-103,共8页Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“作为规范政府经济权力标准的竞争中立制度研究”(20YJA820001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：随着ChatGPT的广泛运用,关于人工智能的法律问题探讨再次成为舆论焦点。根据ChatGPT系统与人类互动生成相应文字内容的特性,ChatGPT生成内容是否受《著作权法》保护问题备受争议。探讨该问题,有两个不可或缺的前提要件,即ChatGPT是否具有法律人格及其生成内容能否被认定为作品,以此确定其是否应受《著作权法》保护。文本认为,ChatGPT尚不具备法律主体资格,在ChatGPT生成内容被认定为作品对其进行保护时,应明确ChatGPT使用者作为生成内容的著作权主体,通过加强对ChatGPT著作权主体的监管实现对其生成内容的规制,以此加快推进人工智能法治化进程。With the widespread use of Chat GPT,the discussion of legal issues on artificial intelligence has once again become the focus of public opinion.According to the characteristics of ChatGPT system and human interaction to generate corresponding text content,it is controversial whether ChatGPT generated content is protected by the Copyright Law.To explore this issue,there are two indispensable prerequisites,that is,whether ChatGPT has legal personality and whether its generated content can be recognized as a work.This paper believes that ChatGPT does not yet have the qualification of a legal entity.When the content generated by ChatGPT is recognized as a work,it should be clearly defined that ChatGPT users are the copyright subjects of the generated content,and the regulation of the generated content should be implemented by strengthening the supervision of ChatGPT copyright subjects.In this way,we can accelerate the process of promoting the rule of law in artificial intelligence.

关 键 词：ChatGPT 法律人格 作品 著作权 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学] TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]