“丝路学”概念考释与“一带一路”学术话语权建设研究  

Interpretating the Concept of“Silk Road Studies”and Constructing Academic Discourse on the“Belt and Road”Initiatives

作　　者：马丽蓉 MA Li-rong(Institute of Silk Road Strategy Studies,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620;Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学丝路战略研究所,上海201620 [2]中国人民大学重阳金融研究院,北京100872

出　　处：《新疆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第2期137-148,共12页Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“‘一带一路’与中国新疆周边国家伙伴关系发展研究”(18BGJ020);上海外国语大学2019年度重大课题“基于丝路学视角的习近平外交思想研究”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：文本立足“丝路学”概念考释样本分析,旨在还原中国丝路学发现、对接、立学的成长三部曲。在重释“一带一路”新实践中形成多维并进的立学新势头,成为全球丝路学转型的突出现象。黄文弼现象、季羡林现象、耿昇现象等案例折射出中国丝路学由自觉学科意识向自主知识生产艰难迈进的历程,廓清了中国敦煌学赢得全球话语权的历史逻辑,确立了建设“一带一路”学术话语权的新方向,在发掘问题、修正理论、丰富概念过程中,形成建设“一带一路”学术话语权的中国路径,在聚焦丝路学核心议题研究过程中,回应哲学之问、学术之问、时代之问。Based on a sample analysis of the concept of “Silk Road Studies”, this paper aims to outline the growth of Chinese Silk Road Studies in terms of discovery, interface and establishment. In the new practice of reinterpreting the “Belt and Road”, a new momentum of multi-dimensional and parallel progress has been formed, significantly transforming global Silk Road studies.Researches by Chinese scholars such as Huang Wenbi, Ji Xianlin, and Geng Sheng reflect the difficult process of China's Silk Road studies in moving from conscious disciplinary awareness to autonomous knowledge production, showing the historical logic of how China's Dunhuang studies has won the right to speak globally, and establishing a new direction in building the academic discourse of the “Belt and Road”. In other words, we need to form a Chinese path to build the academic discourse of the “Belt and Road” in the process of uncovering problems, revising theories, and enriching concepts, and respond to the philosophical, academic questions of the times by focusing on the core issues of Silk Road studies.

关 键 词：丝路学 概念考释样本 学术现象案例 三大体系 “一带一路”学术话语权 

分 类 号：D82[政治法律—政治学] G125[政治法律—外交学]