老年重型颅脑损伤患者1047例诊治预后分析  

Analysis of the risk factors of prognosis for severe craniocerebral injury in the elderly

作　　者：郑首学[1] 鲁宏伟 常斌鸽[1] 李牧[1] Zheng Shouxue;Lu Hongwei;Chang Binge;Li Mu(Department of Neurosurgery,the First Central Hospital of Tianjin,Tianjin 300192,China)

机构地区：[1]天津市第一中心医院神经外科,天津300192

出　　处：《中国中西医结合急救杂志》2024年第1期50-52,共3页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care

摘　　要：目的分析影响老年重型颅脑损伤患者预后的因素。方法回顾性分析1997年1月至2021年12月天津市第一中心医院神经外科收治的1047例老年重型颅脑损伤患者的临床资料,包括性别、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)致伤因素和损伤类型、入院后的治疗情况;根据格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)以状态良好、轻残、重残为治疗有效,持续植物状态、死亡为治疗无效;采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析影响重型颅脑损伤患者预后的危险因素。结果1047例患者中治疗有效612例(占58.45%),治疗无效435例(占41.55%);存在颅内血肿患者的治疗无效率明显高于无颅内血肿者[53.8%(342/636)比22.6%(93/411)],复合损伤患者的治疗无效率明显高于单纯颅脑损伤者[62.4%(249/399)比28.7%(186/648)],GCS评分为3~5分患者的治疗无效率明显高于GCS评分6~8分者[64.8%(243/375)比28.6%(192/672)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);男性和女性、是否存在颅骨骨折患者治疗无效率比较差异均无统计学意义[分别为42.2%(294/696)比40.2%(141/351)和37.9%(69/182)比42.3%(366/865),均P>0.05]。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,颅内血肿[优势比(OR)=2.266,95%可信区间(95%CI)为1.656~3.103]损伤类型(OR=1.816,95%CI为1.279~2.578)、GCS评分(OR=2.262,95%CI为1.582~3.234)是影响老年重型颅脑损伤患者预后的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。结论为降低致残率和病死率,应重视影响老年重型颅脑损伤患者预后的因素,减少颅内血肿和多发性损伤的发生以及关注CCS评分一定程度上能改善患者预后。Objective To analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of elderly patients with severe craniocerebral injury.Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 1047 elderly patients with severe craniocerebral injury admitted to the department of neurosurgery of Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 1997 to December 2021,including gender,Glasgow coma scale(GCS),injury factors and injury types,and treatment after admission.According to Glasgow outcome scale(GOS),good condition,mild disability,severe disability are considered as effective treatment,while persistent vegetative state and death are considered as ineffective treatment.Univariate and multivariate Logistic analysis of risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with severe craniocerebral injury.Results_Among the 1047 patients,612(58.45%)were effectively treated,and 435(41.55%)were ineffective.The inefficiency of treatment in patients with intracranial hematoma was significantly higher than that of patients without intracranial hematoma[53.8%(342/636)vs.22.6%(93/411)],the treatment inefficiency of patients with complex injuries was significantly higher than that of patients with simple craniocerebral injury[62.4%(249/399)vs.28.7%(186/648)],the treatment inefficiency of patients with GCS scores of 3-5 was significantly higher than that of patients with GCS scores of 6-8[64.8%(243/375)vs.28.6%(192/672)],all differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the treatment inefficiency between males and females,or between patients with and without skull fractures[42.2%(294/696)vs.40.2%(141/351)and 37.9%(69/182)vs.42.3%(366/865),respectively,all P>0.05].Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that intracranial hematoma[odds ratio(OR)=2.266,95%confidence interval(95%CI)was 1.656-3.103],type of injury(OR=1.816,95%CI was 1.279-2.578)and CCS score(OR=2.262,95%CI was 1.582-3.234)were independent prognostic factors for elderly patients with craniocerebral injury(all P<0.05).Conclusion To reduce the morbidity a

关 键 词：颅脑损伤 预后 因素 

分 类 号：R651.1[医药卫生—外科学]