从《文心雕龙札记》看黄侃的骈散观念  

A Study of Huang Kan's View of Parallel Prose and Prose from Notes of Literary Mind and Dragon Carving

作　　者：吕梦涵 李金松[1] Lv Menghan;Li Jinsong(School of Literature,Henan University,Kaifeng 475000,China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学文学院,河南开封475000

出　　处：《六盘水师范学院学报》2024年第2期62-71,共10页Journal of Liupanshui Normal University

摘　　要：黄侃先后参加了清末民初的骈散文派之争与新旧文学论战,在论争中形成了宏通的骈散观念,他作《文心雕龙札记》,推重刘勰《文心雕龙》的折中之旨以调和骈散。围绕各学派的论争焦点,黄侃从内涵与外延分别定义文学范畴,在兼顾文体纷杂的同时强调声律、辞采的重要性,并主张兼习文笔之体。黄侃秉持骈散并重的态度,力主骈文实不可废,提倡奇偶适变,他兼重命意与修辞,细析并评点《文心雕龙》所总结的声偶文学修辞技巧,倡导为文者创作辞义相称的作品。黄侃通达的骈散观念既对桐城派文采不足之弊予以纠偏,又对《文选》派持论过严之处加以补正,推动了骈文与散文两派的互融。Huang Kan successively participated in the dispute between the parallel prose and prose and the old and new litera⁃ture debates in the late Qing dynasty and early Republican period.During this argument,Huang Kan developed his enlightened view of parallel prose and prose.In order to mediate this dispute,Huang Kan wrote Notes on Literary Mind and Dragon Carving and emphasized Liu Xie’s neutral point of view.Around the focus of the debate between the schools of thought,Huang Kan de⁃fined literature in terms of connotation and extension.He also stressed the importance of sound and rhetoric.Facing the reality of stylistic complexity,Huang Kan advocated the study of applied genres.Huang Kan valued parallel prose and prose and focused on the importance of parallel prose.The thrust of the article and rhetorical technique are also valued by Huang Kan.He explained the rhetorical device which Liu Xie concluded,and advocated for writers to produce excellent work not only graceful but also practical.Huang Kan’s enlightened view of parallel prose and prose not only corrected Tongcheng School’s theoretical errors,but also amended the overly rigid theory of Wenxuan School.Huang Kan has improved the mutual integration of parallel prose school and prose school.

关 键 词：黄侃 《文心雕龙札记》 骈文 修辞 文笔论 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]