检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈伟光[1] 张建 郑一爽 CHEN Wei-guang;ZHANG Jian;ZHENG Yi-shuang
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学国际战略研究院,广州510420
出 处:《东北亚论坛》2024年第3期98-112,128,共16页Northeast Asia Forum
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD061)。
摘 要:金融危机以来,特别是在世纪疫情、乌克兰危机和新一轮技术革命的冲击下,大国战略竞争加剧,美国等西方国家的政治经济哲学发生了重大调整,以产业链韧性和国家安全为目标的新型产业政策兴起,全球产业链供应链面临重大重组。西方大国产业政策的战略化、显性化、普及化甚至工具化、武器化,使得国家主导产业政策的跨国合作与协调成为国际社会的重要关切,也对全球产业治理提出了新的挑战。在产业链重构背景下,以新型产业政策为切入点分析全球产业治理,不仅有助于丰富全球经济治理理论体系,同时也为中国深度参与全球产业治理实践提供策略思考和实施路径。Since the international financial crisis of 2008,especially amidst the 21st-century pandemic,the Ukraine crisis,and the impact of a new wave of technological revolution,the intensification of great power strategic competition has led to significant adjustments in the political and economic philosophies of western countries such as the United States.A novel industrial policy,focusing on the resilience of supply chains and national securityhas emerged,leading to.a major restructuring of global industrial and supply chains.The strategic,explicit,widespread,and even instrumentalized and weaponized nature of industrial policies in western major powers has made international cooperation and coordination in state-led industrial policies a crucial concern for the international community,posing new challenges to global industrial governance.Analyzing global industrial governance through the lens of the new industrial policy in the context of supply chain restructuring not only contributes to enriching the theoretical framework of global econonic governance,but also provides strategic thinking and implementation paths for China to deeply engage in global industrial governance practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7