检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王信然 Wang Xinran
机构地区:[1]中山大学哲学系
出 处:《开放时代》2024年第2期125-139,M0006,共16页Open Times
摘 要:“义利之辨”在思想史上有“儒者第一义”之称,但它在近代中国“经济史”创作过程中扮演什么角色,以及它在近代中国经济思想上的意义,特别是与早期社会主义的关系,有待进一步探究。晚清民初儒者、经济学家陈焕章通过“义利之辨”的经济史展开创作《孔门理财学》,认为“是书实可名为《中国生计史》”,基于时势构想了植根儒家传统以政制为中心的理财学。本文试图分析陈焕章借鉴德国历史经济学派写作方式,会通经典世界的理财学与历史世界的生计史,以“义利之辨”为主旨构建基于“家”的社会主义,反映了唯物史观被引进和社会经济史范式成型之前本土知识分子对社会主义的理解方式。The distinction between justice and profit,known as“the first principle of Confucianism”in the history of thought,has yet to receive sufficient attention regarding its role in the process of creating“economic history”in modern China and its relationship with early China socialism thoughts in terms of ideas.In his economic historical writing of“the justice-profit debate,”the modern Confucian scholar and economist,Chen Huan-chang created The Economic Principles of Confucius and His School by combining the debate between justice and profit with an economy centred on political systems,which he believed could be renamed Chinese Economic History.Based on the concept of history,this paper tries to examine how Chen Huan-chang used the works of the German historical school to build a“socialism”based on the“family”with the theme of“justice-profit debate”by bridging the“administering wealth”and the“economic history”,reflecting the understanding of intellectuals of“socialism”prior to the introduction of historical materialism and the formation of social and economic history paradigms.
分 类 号:F092.6[经济管理—政治经济学] F129
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171