澳大利亚版权的刑法保护及对我国的启示  

Criminal Law Protection of Copyright in Australia and Its Implications

作　　者：焦俊峰[1] Jiao Junfeng

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,430073

出　　处：《世界社会科学》2024年第2期125-143,245,共20页SOCIAL SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL

摘　　要：澳大利亚经过多年发展已形成较为完备的知识产权刑法保护制度和刑事规制体系。在罪名认定上,澳大利亚针对不同的知识产权内容、不同性质的行为方式“量体裁衣”,刑法规范严密而不失层次梯度,尤其突出对易受侵犯的著作权、邻接权的前置化保护和大规模商业化侵权、侵犯信息网络传播权等重点领域的法益保护。在刑罚配置上,澳大利亚以轻刑化为基调,注重不同刑种间的协调以及刑罚措施与非刑罚措施的密切衔接。通过学习与借鉴澳大利亚知识产权刑事规制经验,从完善我国著作权犯罪的刑法规定、罪状设定,优化著作权犯罪的刑罚配置,以及加强部门法规范的衔接配合这三个方面着手,可以有效提高我国著作权刑事治理的制度水平和能力建设。After years of development,Australia has established a relatively comprehensive system of intellectual property criminal law protection and criminal regulation.In terms of charge determination,Australia tailors its criminal law to different intellectual property contents and behaviors of different natures,with strict and hierarchical norms,particularly highlighting the pre protection of vulnerable copyright and neighboring rights,as well as the legal protection of key areas such as large-scale commercial infringement and infringement of information network dissemination rights.In terms of penalty allocation,Australia adopts a light sentence approach,emphasizing coordination between different types of punishments and close connection between criminal and non-criminal measures.By learning from and drawing on the experience of intellectual property criminal regulation in Australia,China can improve copyright criminal governance by improving the criminal law provisions and charge setting for copyright crimes,optimizing the penalty allocation for copyrightt crimes,and strengthening the coordination of departmental legal norms.

关 键 词：知识产权 刑事规制 版权法 罪刑设定 澳大利亚 

分 类 号：D961.1[政治法律—法学]