反技术兴奋剂规范的法理基础、逻辑补位与体系构建  

Anti Technology Doping:Legal Basis,Logic Reasoning and Rule Construction

作　　者：孙遥 SUN Yao(Civil and Commercial Law School,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan 250014,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院民商法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《上海体育大学学报》2024年第6期27-38,共12页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目(22DFXJ07)。

摘　　要：体育领域的技术不当应用起到了类似于兴奋剂的效果,不仅违背了反兴奋剂规范的整体立法宗旨,阻碍了体育公正,消解了运动员的主体性,也危害了体育项目的长远利益。在现有规范体系下,国际、国内的上位法均未承认技术兴奋剂的法律地位,导致了诸多弊端。我国应从法律角度合理界定技术兴奋剂的构成,特别是其与不公平优势之间的因果关系,并从立法、司法和执法三方面入手:(1)推动《世界反兴奋剂条例》承认技术兴奋剂的违法性;(2)推动国际体育仲裁院形成统一、协调、连贯的裁判立场;(3)推动各单项体育联合会制定更具约束力的监管措施,构建反技术兴奋剂的立体规范体系,切实维护我国的正当体育利益和全世界的体育公正。The misuse of technology in sport functions as stimulants,which not only violates the legislative purpose of anti-doping rules,but hinders the fairness and justice of sports competitions,dispels the subjectivity of athletes,and endangers the long-term interests of specific sports.Under the existing regulatory system,the legal status of anti technology doping law has yet to be found in the higher-level laws domestically and abroad,leading to multiple legal problems.Therefore,China should rationally define the composition of technology doping,especially its causality with unfair advantages,and take actions from three perspectives,namely,legislative,judicial and enforcement:to promote World Anti-Doping Code to acknowledge the illegality of technical stimulants;to push the formation of a unified,coordinated and coherent judgment attitude of CAS;and to promote the formulation of more coercive regulatory measures and regulatory system of anti technology doping,thus to effectively safeguard the legitimate interests of sports.

关 键 词：兴奋剂 反技术兴奋剂 法理基础 因果关系 体系构建 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]