我国专利间接侵权的独立化证成与制度建构  

Independent Certification and System Construction of Contributory Infringement of Patent in China

作　　者：陈佳举 CHEN Jia-jv(School of law,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872,PRC)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期99-109,共11页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：最高人民法院2021年度司法案例研究课题“专利间接侵权典型案例研究”(32)。

摘　　要：专利间接侵权源于但又不同于共同侵权,是一种独立的责任形态,具有其自身的规范意义和价值,应在《专利法》中予以单独规定。在制度建构时,应摒弃日本纯客观主义,确立“双重”的“明知和应知”主观要件;在客观要件上,应借鉴德国经验,拓宽“专用品”的内涵,增设行为主体的限制与例外,并具化“提供”的行为方式;在法律适用上,应优先适用专利间接侵权规则确定责任的成立与否,在责任成立时直接追究间接侵权人的责任。Contributory infringement of patent originates from but is different from joint infringement.It is an independent form of liability and has its own normative significance and value.It should be amended and clarified in the revision of patent law.In the construction of the system,we should abandon the pure objectivism of Japan,and establish the"double"standard of"knowing and should know"in the subjective elements;In the objective elements,we should learn from the German experience,broaden the connotation of"special supplies",add restrictions and exceptions of the behavior subject,and embody the behavior type of"providing".In the application of law,the establishment of tort liability should be determined by the specific rules of contributory patent infringement.When the liability is established,the liability of the contributory infringer should be directly investigated.

关 键 词：专利间接侵权 共同侵权 立法模式 主观要件 客观要件 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]