知识产权民刑交叉问题的适用省思与路径优化  

Reflections on the Application of Intellectual Property Related Civil Criminal Cross Disciplinary Issues and Path Optimization

作　　者：叶赟葆 曹帅帅 YE Yunbao;CAO Shuaishuai(School of Law,Nanyang Normal University,Nanyang Henan 473061,China;Faculty of Humanities&Law,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin Heilongjiang 150040,China)

机构地区：[1]南阳师范学院法学院,河南南阳473061 [2]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《南阳师范学院学报》2024年第4期38-44,共7页Journal of Nanyang Normal University

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究项目“知识产权保护刑民衔接立法及实务机制研究”(GJ2023D37);南阳师范学院博士专项科研项目“电子商务中商标保护立法问题研究”。

摘　　要：囿于部门法间的差异,民刑交叉难办案件所引起的争论屡见不鲜。检视民刑交叉既有面相后,得出知识产权具有不同于常规民刑交叉案件的特性。表现出惯有“先刑后民”处理模式的适用障碍、刑法同知识产权法的法益认知存有偏差以及“合一制”的形式化并未使知识产权在强国战略中得到充分保障,进而产生权利救济的缺憾。对此,一方面要重视先决条件,以类型化视角观察知识产权的不同客体和民刑交叉事实对程序选择的影响,明确民事确权优先和刑事后置的基调。另一方面采用解释论进路,对具体条文中“物质损失”“唯数额论”内涵扩大解释,从立法论角度设计刑事“空白罪状”条款及优化知识产权法院的配置。从而,最终实现知识产权强国战略的价值目标和发展效益最佳化。Due to the differences between departmental laws,the controversy caused by the intersection of civil and criminal“difficult cases”is not uncommon.After examining the existing aspects of civil criminal cross disciplinary cases,it is concluded that intellectual property has characteristics different from conventional civil criminal cross disciplinary cases.The obstacles to the application of the traditional“criminal punishment before civil punishment”treatment model,the deviation in the recognition of legal interests between criminal law and intellectual property law,and the formalization of the“unity”system have not fully pro-tected intellectual property in the strategy of building a strong country,resulting in the lack of rights remedies.On the one hand,it is necessary to attach importance to the prerequisites,observe the impact of different objects of intellectual property rights and the fact of civil criminal intersection on the selection of procedures from a typological perspective,and clarify the tone of priority in civil rights confirmation and criminal post establishment.On the other hand,adopting an interpretive approach,expanding the interpretation of the connotations of“material loss”and“only quantity theory”in specific provisions;Design criminal“blank charge”clauses from a legislative perspective and optimize the configuration of intellectual property courts.Ultimately,the value goals and development benefits of the intellectual property power strategy will be maximized.

关 键 词：知识产权 民刑交叉 先刑后民 先民后刑 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]