《仲裁法》如何更加国际化——基于《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》主要条款的考察  

How to Make Arbitration Law More International——Investigating the Key Provisions in the Revised Arbitration Law

作　　者：沈伟[1] 芦心玥 SHEN Wei;LU Xinyue(KoGuan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期125-131,共7页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》通过大幅修订,力求促进我国仲裁制度的进一步国际化发展。以《示范法》和《纽约公约》为国际化对标标准,《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》在仲裁庭权力和仲裁裁决的司法审查、临时仲裁、法院协助取证等方面基本符合国际标准,但应进一步细化具体措施的实施标准和配套规则,以期为仲裁实践提供更为清晰的指引。此外,此次修订在仲裁机构法律地位、仲裁员任职资格与责任等方面还未达到国际化标准,可以进一步提升意思自治程度,深化仲裁机构改革、引入仲裁员责任有限豁免制度。The Revised Draft of Arbitration Law has been substantially amended to enhance the level of internationalization of China’s arbitration system.Taking the Model Law and the New York Convention as benchmarks,the revised draft generally meets the international standards in the areas of power of arbitral tribunals,judicial review of arbitral awards,ad hoc arbitration and court assistance.However,the implementation standards of specific measures should be further refined,supporting rules should be improved,and clearer judicial guidance should be provided.The revised draft does not satisfy international standards in terms of arbitrators’qualification and liability as well as the arbitral institutions’legal status,it should further enhance the party autonomy,deepen the reform of arbitration institutions,and introduce the qualified exemption system for arbitrators.

关 键 词：《仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》 仲裁国际化 《示范法》 《纽约公约》 友好仲裁 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]