主体理论的各种话语模式及其社会根源  

Various Discourse Models of the Subject and Their Social Roots

作　　者：周小仪 Zhou Xiaoyi(South China Business College,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou,Guangdong Province,China)

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学南国商学院,广东广州510545

出　　处：《外国文学》2024年第3期72-86,共15页Foreign Literature

摘　　要：主体性是20世纪末中国学界的热门话题。但20世纪50年代以降,人文主体性在西方受到广泛质疑,福柯、阿尔都塞和早期拉康等发展出结构主义空白主体说;之后克里斯蒂娃、德勒兹等后结构主义者重建了生命主体。这是一种能动主体性,具有内在强度和张力。巴迪欧、齐泽克和奈格里等人则从马克思主义实践论方面推进了能动主体性的发展,他们阐述了圣保罗和列宁的行动哲学,并解释了主体化过程的内在机制。本文对各种主体性话语模式的逻辑发展进行探讨,并发掘其历史背景和社会根源。本文强调行动主体的阶级层面,把实践主体看作应对全球化地缘政治冲突和东西方文化矛盾的途径。Subjectivity is one of the hottest topics in Chinese academia at the end of the last century.1950s has fallen,the humanistic subject has been widely questioned in the West;Foucault,Althusser,and early Lacan developed a structuralist notion of the absent subject.But then people still pay attention to the subject's affective issues,Kristeva,Deleuze,and other poststructuralists revitalized the subject of life force.Badiou,Zizek and Negri,among others,have advanced the development of subjectivity in terms of Marxist praxis.They restate the philosophy of action of St.Paul and Lenin and explain the mechanisms inherent in the process of subjectivation.This paper explores the logical inheritance of various modes of subjectivity discourse and uncovers their historical background and social roots.The paper emphasizes the class dimension of the subject of action and sees subjective practice as a way to cope with globalized geopolitical conflicts and East-West cultural contradictions.

关 键 词：主体性 四种话语 行动 实践 阶级 

分 类 号：G0[文化科学]