检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵祥恩 Zhao Xiang'en(School of Humanities,Jiamusi University,Jiamusi,Heilongjiang,154007)
机构地区:[1]佳木斯大学人文学院,黑龙江佳木斯154007
出 处:《市场周刊》2024年第16期167-170,共4页Market Weekly
摘 要:近年来,随着移动支付的兴起,二维码支付凭借其简便、高效的优势,逐渐超越了传统的现金交易,成为生活中最主要的交易方式。然而,二维码支付的兴起也给不法分子带来了可乘之机,在实务中偷换商家二维码取财案件频频发生。对此类案件的定性问题,无论在理论界还是实务界都颇有争议,存在着“诈骗说”与“盗窃说”两种主流观点。偷换商家二维码的行为不属于诈骗罪中的欺骗行为并且缺乏诈骗罪中的认识错误和处分行为,不应当认定为诈骗罪。偷换商家二维码的行为应当认定为盗窃罪。In recent years,with the rise of mobile payment,QR code payment has gradually surpassed the traditional cash transaction by virtue of its simple and efficient advantages,and has become the most important way of transaction in life.However,the rise of QR code payment has also brought opportunities to criminals,and cases of stealing to exchange merchantsQR code for money frequently occur in practice.The qualitative problem of such cases is quite controversial both in theory and practice.There are two mainstream viewpoints:“fraud theory”and“theft theory”.The practice of illegally changing the QR code of the merchant does not belong to the cheating behavior in the crime of fraud and lacks the cognitive error and punishment behavior in the crime of fraud,and should not be identified as the crime of fraud.The act of illegally changing the QR code of the business shall be identified as theft.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.20.224.152