检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖曦 LIAO Xi(Law School,Central South University,Changsha 410083,Hunan,China)
出 处:《韶关学院学报》2024年第4期49-55,共7页Journal of Shaoguan University
基 金:湖南省教育科学“十四五”规划重点课题(XJK23AJD010)。
摘 要:听证是正当法律程序的集中体现。将听证程序引入高校内部管理,是高校学生管理工作法治化的有益尝试,对平衡高校权力运行与学生权利保护具有重要意义。当前,我国高校学生违纪处分听证存在功能定位错乱、适用范围模糊狭窄、基本原则缺位等问题。为保障学生申辩与陈述权利,应确立听证制度的独立地位,拓宽学生违纪处分听证的适用范围,树立听证公开原则与听证笔录排他原则,并引入非正式听证作为学生违纪处分程序的有效补充。Hearings are the epitome of due process of law.The introduction of hearings into the internal management of colleges and universities is a useful attempt to legalize the management of students in universities,and is of great significance to balance the operation of power in colleges and universities and the protection of students’rights.At present,there are problems such as the confusion of functional positioning,the vague and narrow scope of application,and the lack of basic principles in the disciplinary punishment hearings of college students in China.In order to protect students’rights of defense and representation,the independent status of the hearing system should be established,the scope of application of student disciplinary punishment hearings should be broadened,the principle of openness of hearings and the principle of exclusivity of hearing transcripts should be established,and informal hearings should be introduced as an effective supplement to students’disciplinary punishment procedures.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49