解铃须从系铃处——Records与Archives概念正史(三)  

To Untie the Knot,One Must Start from Where it Was Tied-A Corrective History of the Concepts“Records”and“Archives”(Part 3)

作　　者：王岚 Wang Lan

机构地区：[1]国家档案局

出　　处：《档案管理》2024年第2期27-33,共7页Archives Management

摘　　要：笔者的“四正”,从名分、本义、学理、法律上已弄清Records的含义,但坚持“Records文件观”者依旧质疑:若Records是档案,那Archives是什么?两者并列时又怎么翻译?还有人说Records是记录。既然是英语和法语带来的问题,循着英法档案历史去寻找,才是解铃的关键:以英法八百年档案工作中重要人物和事件为主线,探求其档案的源流、本质、内含及演变,为档案概念正史。The author's“Four rectifications”has provided a clear understanding of the concept of Records in terms of name,meaning,reasoning,and jurisprudence.However,there are still those who argue for the view of“records as documents”and raise questions about the distinction between records and archives.How should we translate these terms when they are used interchangeably?Some even suggest that Records are simply a form of documentation.The debate surrounding Records and archives stems from differences in English and French terminology.By delving into the history of English records and French archives,we can unravel this issue.By examining key figures and events in the 800-year history of records and archives management in England and France,we can explore the origins,essence,content,and evolution of these concepts.This historical analysis will help us understand the complex relationship between records and archives,and shed light on their conceptual history.

关 键 词：卷档 录卷归档 档案 皇家档案 馆藏档案 现行档案 概念 历史 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] G271[政治法律—法学]