检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王立梅[1,2] Wang Limei
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学数据法治研究院,北京100088 [2]中国法学会网络与信息法学研究会
出 处:《探索与争鸣》2024年第4期109-121,179,共14页Exploration and Free Views
摘 要:解构数据承载利益的复杂性是数据产权配置绕不开的难题。解题第一步是认清谁参与了数据价值生产,在其中发挥着何种作用。目前,学界对自然人数据来源者利益保护的探讨,主要集中在隐私权及个人信息保护方面,而自然人参与数据利益分配的资格长期被悬置,成为数据法中被忽视的议题,知情同意等机制可能在其中沦为为资本增值服务的角色。基于数据来源是价值续造的起点、普遍免费服务并非合理对价及促进流通激励、保护数字人格等方面的考量,可以采取货币兑换、权能兑换及集体托管等路径,实现对自然人数据来源者的财产权保护。The complexity of deconstructing data carrying benefits is an unavoidable challenge in data property allocation.The first step in solving the problem is to recognize who is involved in the production of data value and what role it plays.Among them,the discussion on the protection of the interests of natural person data sources mainly focuses on privacy rights and personal information protection,leading to the deprivation of the qualification of natural persons to participate in the distribution of data benefits,and the risk of mechanisms such as informed consent becoming puppets of capital appreciation.Based on the consideration that data sources are the starting point for value creation,universal free services are not reasonable considerations,and promoting circulation incentives,protecting digital personalities,etc.,we can try paths such as currency exchange,power exchange,and collective custody to clarify the property rights protection of data sources.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49