检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈辉[1,2] Chen Hui
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院 [2]南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院
出 处:《法商研究》2024年第3期75-90,共16页Studies in Law and Business
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(19BFX024)。
摘 要:传统法律解释论陷入客观性依赖的困境,在主观解释论与客观解释论、形式解释论与实质解释论之间徘徊。功能主义法律解释论试图超越传统法律解释论,但是在何种功能主义问题上存在社科法学与法教义学的争论。无论是社科法学还是法教义学视角的功能主义法律解释都陷入客观性依赖,与传统法律解释论的问题无异。以超越主客观二元论为基础的功能主义法律解释论需要彻底清除二元论的残余,通过超越二元论的知识论和语言观,彻底摆脱客观性依赖。一种彻底贯彻超越二元论立场的功能主义法律解释论获得证立。Traditional interpretive theory falls into the predicament of relying on objectivity,wandering between subjective and objective,formal and substantive interpretation.Functionalist interpretive theory tries to go beyond traditional interpretive theory,but on the question of what kind of functionalism there are disputes and differences between the two perspectives of functionalism:social science jurisprudence and legal dogmatics.The functionalist interpretation of both social science and legal dogmatics all rely on objectivity,which is not different from the problem of traditional interpretation theory.The functionalist legal interpretive theory based on the transcendence of subjective and objective dualism needs to thoroughly eliminate the remnants of dualism,and through the transcending of dualism in epistemology and language views,completely break away from the dependence on objectivity.A functionalist legal interpretive theory that thoroughly implements the transcendental stance can be supported.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.164.78