真理标准问题大讨论研究的回顾与思考  

A Review and Reflection on the Study of a Major Debate on What Constitutes Truth

作　　者：王怀乐 Wang Huaiyue

机构地区：[1]当代中国研究所 [2]当代中国研究所当代中国政治与行政制度史研究中心,100009

出　　处：《当代中国史研究》2024年第3期28-40,M0003,M0004,共15页Contemporary China History Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“加强党史、新中国史、改革开放史、社会主义发展史教育研究”(21ZDA074)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：真理标准问题大讨论是新中国史上具有里程碑意义的历史事件。学界对这场大讨论给予了高度关注,在讨论分期、过程、人物与评价等方面形成了丰富的研究成果,既比较系统地描述了大讨论的始末缘由,总结了大讨论的重要意义与深刻启示,又为今后研究奠定了良好基础。从整体上看,已有研究呈现“头重脚轻,始详末略”;“强干弱枝,央地不均”;“亲历者说得多,局外人讲得少”等特点。今后,一方面要深掘历史,加强对大讨论后半程的研究,不断拓展研究视野,引入政治学、新闻传播学等学科视角,深化对大讨论的立体认识;另一方面要超越讨论本身,深入研究大讨论成因所折射出的重大理论问题。The major debate on what constitutes truth was a milestone historical event.The academic community has paid high attention to it,and has formed rich research results in the aspects of discussion stages,processes,characters,and evaluations.They not only systematically described the origin and ending of the debate,summarized its important significance and profound insights,but also laid a good foundation for future research.Overall,existing research has been top-heavy and shown detailed starting and omitted ending,strong trunk and weak branches,uneven distribution of central and local areas as well as the experienced people told more while outsiders told less.In the future,on the one hand,we need to dig into historical research,strengthen research on the latter half of the debate,continuously expand our research horizons,introduce disciplinary perspectives such as political science and journalism into researches,and deepen our three-dimensional understanding of the debate.On the other hand,we need to go beyond the discussion itself and delve into the significant theoretical issues reflected in the causes of the debate.

关 键 词：真理标准问题大讨论 中共十一届三中全会 理论工作务虚会补课 

分 类 号：K27[历史地理—历史学] D25[历史地理—中国史]